Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885599›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2015

A comparative study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body bone scanning for imaging osteolytic bone metastases.

Lin Zhang, Lihua Chen, Qiao Xie, Yongke Zhang, Lin Cheng, Haitao Li, Jian Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The potential advantages ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of Bone Metastases betweenContrast media & molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  5. Comparison ofContrast media & molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. linzhangswh@yahoo.com.
Lihua ChenDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. clhaaa2002@163.com.
Qiao XieDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. 847179451@qq.com.
Yongke ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. xray_zhang@126.com.
Lin ChengDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. chenglin_0916@163.com.
Haitao LiDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. haitaoli@gmail.com.
Jian WangDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. wangjian_811@yahoo.com.
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and (99m)Tc-methylenediphosphonate (MDP) whole-body bone scanning (BS) for the detection of osteolytic bone metastases.

methodsThirty-four patients with pathologically confirmed malignancies and suspected osteolytic bone metastases underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body BS within 30 days. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with respect to the diagnosis of osteolytic bone metastases and bone lesions were compared between the two imaging methods.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of osteolytic bone metastases were 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.6-96.2%), 83.3% (95% CI, 43.6-96.9%), and 94.2% (95% CI, 91.5-96.1%), respectively. It was found that (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body BS could discriminate between patients with 50.2% (95% CI, 45.4-55.1%) sensitivity, 50.0% (95% CI, 18.8-81.2%) specificity, and 50.2% (95% CI, 45.5-55.1%) accuracy. 18F-FDG PET/CT achieved higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting osteolytic bone metastases than 99mTc-MDP whole-body BS (p<0.001).

conclusionsF-FDG PET/CT has a higher diagnostic value than (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body BS in the detection of osteolytic bone metastases, especially in the vertebra.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Technetium Tc 99m MedronateAdultAgedBone NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteolysisPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Medronate

Identifiers

PMID25885599
PMCPMC4358702
OpenAlexW2123426422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.