Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885566›Full record

ReviewBMC psychiatry2015

Binge-eating disorder diagnosis and treatment: a recap in front of DSM-5.

Federico Amianto, Luisa Ottone, Giovanni Abbate Daga, Secondo Fassino

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03540641 (Effect of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applied on the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on the Clinical and Neuropsychological Variables in Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03540641 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applied on the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on the Clinical and Neuropsychological Variables in Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Autonoma de QueretaroRan2017 to 2018Enrolled30ConditionsBinge-Eating DisorderArmsMagVenture MagPro R30
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Body image, self-esteem, emotion regulation, and eating disorders in adults: a systematic review.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Loss of control as a transdiagnostic feature in obesity-related eating behaviours: A systematic review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 5-HTNutrients · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Psychopharmacologic Management of Eating Disorders.Current psychiatry reports · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Federico AmiantoDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Torino, Psychiatric Clinic, Via Cherasco 11, 10126, Turin, Italy. federico.amianto@unito.it.
Luisa OttoneDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Torino, Psychiatric Clinic, Via Cherasco 11, 10126, Turin, Italy. luisaottone@libero.it.
Giovanni Abbate DagaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Torino, Psychiatric Clinic, Via Cherasco 11, 10126, Turin, Italy. giovanni.abbatedaga@unito.it.
Secondo FassinoDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Torino, Psychiatric Clinic, Via Cherasco 11, 10126, Turin, Italy. secondo.fassino@unito.it.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBinge Eating Disorders is a clinical syndrome recently coded as an autonomous diagnosis in DSM-5. Individuals affected by Binge Eating Disorder (BED) show significantly lower quality of life and perceived health and higher psychological distress compared to the non-BED obese population. BED treatment is complex due to clinical and psychological reasons but also to high drop-out and poor stability of achieved goals. The purpose of this review is to explore the available data on this topic, outlining the state-of-the-art on both diagnostic issues and most effective treatment strategies.

methodsWe identified studies published in the last 6 years searching the MeSH Term "binge eating disorder", with specific regard to classification, diagnosis and treatment, in major computerized literature databases including: Medline, PubMed, PsychINFO and Science Direct.

resultsA total of 233 studies were found and, among them, 71 were selected and included in the review. REVIEW: Although Binge Eating Disorder diagnostic criteria showed empirical consistency, core psychopathology traits should be taken into account to address treatment strategies. The available body of evidence shows psychological treatments as first line interventions, even if their efficacy on weight loss needs further exploration. Behavioral and self-help interventions evidenced some efficacy in patients with lower psychopathological features. Pharmacological treatment plays an important role, but data are still limited by small samples and short follow-up times. The role of bariatric surgery, a recommended treatment for obesity that is often required also by patients with Binge Eating Disorder, deserves more specific studies. Combining different interventions at the same time does not add significant advantages, planning sequential treatments, with more specific interventions for non-responders, seems to be a more promising strategy.

conclusionsDespite its recent inclusion in DSM-5 as an autonomous disease, BED diagnosis and treatment strategies deserve further deepening. A multidisciplinary and stepped-care treatment appears as a promising management strategy. Longer and more structured follow-up studies are required, in order to enlighten long term outcomes and to overcome the high dropout rates affecting current studies.

Indexed as

AdultAppetite StimulantsBariatric SurgeryBinge-Eating DisorderCombined Modality TherapyDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPsychotherapyQuality of LifeSelf CareAppetite Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID25885566
PMCPMC4397811
OpenAlexW2078605997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.