Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885564›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Temporal and spatial constraints on community assembly during microbial colonization of wood in seawater.

Dimitri Kalenitchenko, Sonja K Fagervold, Audrey M Pruski, Gilles Vétion, Mustafa Yücel, Nadine Le Bris, Pierre E Galand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dimitri KalenitchenkoSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Oceanologique, Banyuls sur Mer, France.
Sonja K FagervoldSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Oceanologique, Banyuls sur Mer, France.
Audrey M PruskiSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Oceanologique, Banyuls sur Mer, France.
Gilles VétionSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Oceanologique, Banyuls sur Mer, France.
Mustafa YücelSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Oceanologique, Banyuls sur Mer, France.
Nadine Le BrisSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Oceanologique, Banyuls sur Mer, France.
Pierre E GalandSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Oceanologique, Banyuls sur Mer, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-3247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wood falls on the ocean floor form chemosynthetic ecosystems that remain poorly studied compared with features such as hydrothermal vents or whale falls. In particular, the microbes forming the base of this unique ecosystem are not well characterized and the ecology of communities is not known. Here we use wood as a model to study microorganisms that establish and maintain a chemosynthetic ecosystem. We conducted both aquaria and in situ deep-sea experiments to test how different environmental constraints structure the assembly of bacterial, archaeal and fungal communities. We also measured changes in wood lipid concentrations and monitored sulfide production as a way to detect potential microbial activity. We show that wood falls are dynamic ecosystems with high spatial and temporal community turnover, and that the patterns of microbial colonization change depending on the scale of observation. The most illustrative example was the difference observed between pine and oak wood community dynamics. In pine, communities changed spatially, with strong differences in community composition between wood microhabitats, whereas in oak, communities changed more significantly with time of incubation. Changes in community assembly were reflected by changes in phylogenetic diversity that could be interpreted as shifts between assemblies ruled by species sorting to assemblies structured by competitive exclusion. These ecological interactions followed the dynamics of the potential microbial metabolisms accompanying wood degradation in the sea. Our work showed that wood is a good model for creating and manipulating chemosynthetic ecosystems in the laboratory, and attracting not only typical chemosynthetic microbes but also emblematic macrofaunal species.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaEcosystemFungiMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySeawaterWood

Identifiers

PMID25885564
PMCPMC4817635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.