Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885460›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2015

Specialist and primary care physicians' views on barriers to adequate preparation of patients for renal replacement therapy: a qualitative study.

Raquel C Greer, Jessica M Ameling, Kerri L Cavanaugh, Bernard G Jaar, Vanessa Grubbs, Carrie E Andrews, Patti Ephraim, Neil R Powe, Julia Lewis, Ebele Umeukeje and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Raquel C GreerJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. rfcharle@jhmi.edu.
Jessica M AmelingJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. jamelin1@jhmi.edu.
Kerri L CavanaughVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. kerri.cavanaugh@Vanderbilt.Edu.
Bernard G JaarJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. bjaar@aol.com.
Vanessa GrubbsUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. grubbsv@medsfgh.ucsf.edu.
Carrie E AndrewsJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. carrie.e.andrews@gmail.com.
Patti EphraimJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. pephraim@jhu.edu.
Neil R PoweUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. NPowe@medsfgh.ucsf.edu.
Julia LewisVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. julia.b.lewis@Vanderbilt.Edu.
Ebele UmeukejeVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. ebele.m.umeukeje@Vanderbilt.Edu.
Luis GimenezJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. lgimene1@jhmi.edu.
Sam JamesUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. JamesS@medsfgh.ucsf.edu.
L Ebony BoulwareDivision of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. ebony.boulware@duke.edu.

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
The Role of Periodontal Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease ProgressionK23DK093710 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRUBBS, VANESSA · 2012 to 2016
$1.0M
Addressing Literacy and Numeracy in Self-care & Clinical Outcomes in ESRDK23DK080952 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAVANAUGH, KERRI · 2008 to 2012
$915k
Improving Primary Care to Narrow Racial Disparities in Chronic Kidney DiseaseK23DK094975 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREER, RAQUEL CHARLES · 2012 to 2015
$722k
Decision support interventions to improve renal replacement therapy preparationR34DK094116 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2011 to 2013
$712k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NIDDK NIH HHS 1K23DK093710-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS 1R34DK094116-01NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK080952NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK080952NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK093710NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK094975NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK094975NIDDK NIH HHS R34 DK094116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly preparation for renal replacement therapy (RRT) is recommended for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet many patients initiate RRT urgently and/or are inadequately prepared.

methodsWe conducted audio-recorded, qualitative, directed telephone interviews of nephrology health care providers (n = 10, nephrologists, physician assistants, and nurses) and primary care physicians (PCPs, n = 4) to identify modifiable challenges to optimal RRT preparation to inform future interventions. We recruited providers from public safety-net hospital-based and community-based nephrology and primary care practices. We asked providers open-ended questions to assess their perceived challenges and their views on the role of PCPs and nephrologist-PCP collaboration in patients' RRT preparation. Two independent and trained abstractors coded transcribed audio-recorded interviews and identified major themes.

resultsNephrology providers identified several factors contributing to patients' suboptimal RRT preparation, including health system resources (e.g., limited time for preparation, referral process delays, and poorly integrated nephrology and primary care), provider skills (e.g., their difficulty explaining CKD to patients), and patient attitudes and cultural differences (e.g., their poor understanding and acceptance of their CKD and its treatment options, their low perceived urgency for RRT preparation; their negative perceptions about RRT, lack of trust, or language differences). PCPs desired more involvement in preparation to ensure RRT transitions could be as "smooth as possible", including providing patients with emotional support, helping patients weigh RRT options, and affirming nephrologist recommendations. Both nephrology providers and PCPs desired improved collaboration, including better information exchange and delineation of roles during the RRT preparation process.

conclusionsNephrology and primary care providers identified health system resources, provider skills, and patient attitudes and cultural differences as challenges to patients' optimal RRT preparation. Interventions to improve these factors may improve patients' preparation and initiation of optimal RRTs.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInterdisciplinary CommunicationQuality of Health CareAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNephrologyPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary CareQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal Replacement TherapyRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID25885460
PMCPMC4387659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.