Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885437›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2015

Impact of the systematic introduction of low-cost bubble nasal CPAP in a NICU of a developing country: a prospective pre- and post-intervention study.

Rossano Rezzonico, Letizia M Caccamo, Valeria Manfredini, Massimo Cartabia, Nieves Sanchez, Zoraida Paredes, Patrizia Froesch, Franco Cavalli, Maurizio Bonati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rossano RezzonicoNICU Rho Az. Ospedaliera "G. Salvini" Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy. rossano.rezzonico@libero.it.
Letizia M CaccamoAz. Ospedaliera Universitaria L. Meyer, Florence, Italy. mletizia.caccamo@tin.it.
Valeria ManfrediniNICU Rho Az. Ospedaliera "G. Salvini" Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy. mannj81@yahoo.it.
Massimo CartabiaDepartment of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy. massimo.catarbia@marionegri.it.
Nieves SanchezUCIN Hospital Bertha Calderon Managua, Managua, Nicaragua. niessan@yahoo.com.
Zoraida ParedesUCIN Hospital Bertha Calderon Managua, Managua, Nicaragua. zorpar@yahoo.com.
Patrizia FroeschAMCA, Aiuto Medico Centro America, Giubiasco, Switzerland. patrizia.froesch@eoc.ch.
Franco CavalliAMCA, Aiuto Medico Centro America, Giubiasco, Switzerland. franco.cavalli@eoc.ch.
Maurizio BonatiDepartment of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy. maurizio.bonati@marionegri.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation (NCPAP) has begun to increase and is progressively replacing conventional mechanical ventilation (MV), becoming the cornerstone treatment for newborn respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, NCPAP use in Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMICs) is poor. Moreover, bubble NCPAP (bNCPAP), for efficacy, cost effectiveness, and ease of use, should be the primary assistance technique employed in newborns with RDS.

objectiveTo measure the impact on in-hospital newborn mortality of using a bNCPAP device as the first intervention on newborns requiring ventilatory assistance.

methods

designProspective pre-intervention and post-intervention study.

settingThe largest Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Nicaragua.

participantsIn all, 230 (2006) and 383 (2008) patients were included.

interventionIn May 2006, a strategy was introduced to promote the systematic use of bNCPAP to avoid intubation and MV in newborns requiring ventilatory assistance. Data regarding gestation, delivery, postnatal course, mortality, length of hospitalisation, and duration of ventilatory assistance were collected for infants assisted between May and December 2006, before the project began, and between May and December 2008, two years afterwards. OUTCOME MEASURES: The pre- vs post-intervention proportion of newborns who died in-hospital was the primary end point. Secondary endpoints included rate of intubation and duration of NICU stay.

resultsSignificant differences were found in the rate of intubation (72 vs 39%; p < 0.0001) and the proportion of patients treated exclusively with bNCPAP (27% vs 61%; p <0.0001). Mortality rate was significantly reduced (40 vs 23%; p < 0.0001); however, an increase in the mean duration of NICU stay was observed (14.6 days in 2006 and 17.5 days in 2008, p = 0.0481). The findings contribute to the evidence that NCPAP, particularly bNCPAP, is the first-line standard of care for efficacy, cost effectiveness, and ease of use in newborns with respiratory distress in LMICs.

conclusionsThis is the first extensive survey performed in a large NICU from a LMICs, proving the efficacy of the systematic use of a bNCPAP device in reducing newborn mortality. These findings are an incentive for considering bNCPAP as an elective strategy to treat newborns with respiratory insufficiency in LMICs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalContinuous Positive Airway PressureCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGestational AgeHospital MortalityHumansInfant, NewbornLength of StayMaleNicaraguaProspective StudiesRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID25885437
PMCPMC4376103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.