Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885372›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Predictors of modern contraceptive use during the postpartum period among women in Uganda: a population-based cross sectional study.

Gideon Rutaremwa, Allen Kabagenyi, Stephen Ojiambo Wandera, Tapiwa Jhamba, Edith Akiror, Hellen Laetitia Nviiri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gideon RutaremwaCentre for Population and Applied Statistics (CPAS), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. grutaremwa@bams.mak.ac.ug.
Allen KabagenyiCentre for Population and Applied Statistics (CPAS), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. akabagenyi@bams.mak.ac.ug.
Stephen Ojiambo WanderaCentre for Population and Applied Statistics (CPAS), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. swandera@gmail.com.
Tapiwa JhambaUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Uganda Country Office, Kampala, Uganda. jhamba@unfpa.org.
Edith AkirorUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Uganda Country Office, Kampala, Uganda. akiror@unfpa.org.
Hellen Laetitia NviiriUganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), Ministry of Finance and Planning, Kampala, Uganda. hnviiri@gmail.com.
Makerere University · UGWorld Health Organization - Uganda · UG

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rationale for promotion of family planning (FP) to delay conception after a recent birth is a best practice that can lead to optimal maternal and child health outcomes. Uptake of postpartum family planning (PPFP) remains low in sub-Saharan Africa. However, little is known about how pregnant women arrive at their decisions to adopt PPFP.

methodsWe used 3298 women of reproductive ages 15-49 from the 2011 UDHS dataset, who had a birth in the 5 years preceding the survey. We then applied both descriptive analyses comprising Pearson's chi-square test and later a binary logistic regression model to analyze the relative contribution of the various predictors of uptake of modern contraceptives during the postpartum period.

resultsMore than a quarter (28%) of the women used modern family planning during the postpartum period in Uganda. PPFP was significantly associated with primary or higher education (OR=1.96; 95% CI=1.43-2.68; OR=2.73; 95% CI=1.88-3.97 respectively); richest wealth status (OR=2.64; 95% CI=1.81-3.86); protestant religion (OR=1.27; 95% CI=1.05-1.54) and age of woman (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95-0.99). In addition, PPFP was associated with number of surviving children (OR=1.09; 95 % CI=1.03-1.16); exposure to media (OR=1.30; 95% CI=1.05-1.61); skilled birth attendance (OR=1.39; 95% CI=1.12-1.17); and 1-2 days timing of post-delivery care (OR=1.68; 95% CI=1.14-2.47).

conclusionsIncreasing reproductive health education and information among postpartum women especially those who are disadvantaged, those with no education and the poor would significantly improve PPFP in Uganda.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodAdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAge FactorsChi-Square DistributionContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth EducationHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUganda

Identifiers

PMID25885372
PMCPMC4372233
OpenAlexW2059759504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.