Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885341›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions.

Rebecca Lorch, Jane Hocking, Rebecca Guy, Alaina Vaisey, Anna Wood, Basil Donovan, Christopher Fairley, Jane Gunn, John Kaldor, Meredith Temple-Smith and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca LorchThe Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. rlorch@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Jane HockingCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. j.hocking@unimelb.edu.au.
Rebecca GuyThe Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. rguy@kirby.unsw.edua.au.
Alaina VaiseyCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. amvaisey@unimelb.edu.au.
Anna WoodCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. annwood@unimelb.edu.au.
Basil DonovanThe Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Bdonovan@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Christopher FairleyCentral Clinical School, Monash University and Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Victoria, Australia. cfairley@mshc.org.au.
Jane GunnDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. j.gunn@unimelb.edu.au.
John KaldorThe Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Jkaldor@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Meredith Temple-SmithDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. m.temple-smith@unimelb.edu.au.
ACCEPt consortium
University of Melbourne · AUMonash University · AUSydney Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlamydia notifications continue to rise in young people in many countries and regular chlamydia testing is an important prevention strategy. Although there have been initiatives to increase testing in primary care, none have specifically investigated the role of practice nurses (PNs) in maximising testing rates. PNs have previously expressed a willingness to be involved, but noted lack of support from general practitioners (GPs) as a barrier. We sought GPs' attitudes and opinions on PNs taking an expanded role in chlamydia testing and partner notification.

methodsIn the context of a cluster randomised trial in mostly rural towns in 4 Australian states, semi structured interviews were conducted with 44 GPs between March 2011 and July 2012. Data relating to PN involvement in chlamydia testing were thematically analysed using a conventional content analysis approach.

resultsThe majority of GPs interviewed felt that a role for PNs in chlamydia testing was appropriate. GPs felt that PNs had more time for patient education and advice, that patients would find PNs easier to talk to and less intimidating than GPs, and that GPs themselves could benefit through a reduction in their workload. Although GPs felt that PNs could be utilised more effectively for preventative health activities such as chlamydia testing, many raised concerns about how these activities would be renumerated whilst some felt that existing workload pressures for PNs could make it difficult for them to expand their role. Whilst some rural GPs recognised that PNs might be well placed to conduct partner notification, they also recognised that issues of patient privacy and confidentiality related to living in a "small town" was also a concern.

conclusionThis is the first qualitative study to explore GPs' views around an increased role for PNs in chlamydia testing. Despite the concerns raised by PNs, these findings suggest that GPs support the concept and recognise that PNs are suited to the role. However issues raised, such as funding and remuneration may act as barriers that will need to be addressed before PNs are supported to make a contribution to increasing chlamydia testing rates in general practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNurse PractitionersNurse's RoleAdultAustraliaChlamydia InfectionsContact TracingFemaleGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRural Health

Identifiers

PMID25885341
PMCPMC4314754
OpenAlexW2028701227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.