Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25885211›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Malaria policies versus practices, a reality check from Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Hypolite Muhindo Mavoko, Gillon Ilombe, Raquel Inocêncio da Luz, Albert Kutekemeni, Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden, Pascal Lutumba

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hypolite Muhindo MavokoDépartement de Médecine Tropicale, Université de Kinshasa, B.P. 747, Kin XI, Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. mavoko@yahoo.com.
Gillon IlombeDépartement de Médecine Tropicale, Université de Kinshasa, B.P. 747, Kin XI, Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. gillonilombe@yahoo.fr.
Raquel Inocêncio da LuzInternational Health Unit, Department of Epidemiology, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. raquel.daluz@uantwerpen.be.
Albert KutekemeniProgramme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme, Ministère de la Santé Publique, Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. albkutek@yahoo.fr.
Jean-Pierre Van geertruydenInternational Health Unit, Department of Epidemiology, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. jean-pierre.vangeertruyden@uantwerpen.be.
Pascal LutumbaDépartement de Médecine Tropicale, Université de Kinshasa, B.P. 747, Kin XI, Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. pascal_lutumba@yahoo.fr.
University of Kinshasa · CDMinistry of Public Health · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) following a confirmed parasitological diagnosis is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Congolese National Malaria Control Program (NMCP). However, commitment and competence of all stakeholders (patients, medical professionals, governments and funders) is required to achieve effective case management and secure the "useful therapeutic life" of the recommended drugs. The health seeking behaviour of patients and health care professionals' practices for malaria management were assessed.

methodsThis was an observational study embedded in a two-stage cluster randomized survey conducted in one health centre (HC) in each of the 12 selected health zones in Kinshasa city. All patients with clinical malaria diagnosis were eligible. Their health seeking behaviour was recorded on a specific questionnaire, as well as the health care practitioners' practices. The last were not aware that their practices would be assessed.

resultsSix hundred and twenty four patients were assessed, of whom 136 (21.8%) were under five years. Three hundred and thirty five (55%) had taken medication prior to the current consultation (self -medication with any product or visiting another HC) of whom 47(14%) took an antimalarial drug, and 56 (9%) were treated presumptively. Among those, 53.6% received monotherapy either with quinine, artesunate, phytomedicines, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or amodiaquine. On the other side, when clinicians were informed about laboratory results, monotherapy was prescribed in 39.9% of the confirmed malaria cases. Only 285 patients (45.7%) were managed in line with WHO and NMCP guidelines, of whom 120 (19.2%) were prescribed an ACT after positive blood smear and 165 (26.4%) received no antimalarial after a negative result.

conclusionThis study shows the discrepancy between malaria policies and the reality on the field in Kinshasa, regarding patients' health seeking behaviour and health professionals' practices. Consequently, the poor compliance to the policies may contribute to the genesis and spread of antimalarial drug resistance and also have a negative impact on the burden of the disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntimalarialsChildChild, PreschoolCongoDemocratic Republic of the CongoDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalariaMaleMiddle AgedAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID25885211
PMCPMC4396810
OpenAlexW2081730131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.