Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884986›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial.

Suzanne Audrey, Ashley R Cooper, William Hollingworth, Chris Metcalfe, Sunita Procter, Adrian Davis, Rona Campbell, Fiona Gillison, Sarah E Rodgers

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne AudreySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. Suzanne.audrey@bristol.ac.uk.
Ashley R CooperCentre for Exercise Nutrition and Health Sciences, and National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition Diet and Lifestyle, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK. Ashley.cooper@bristol.ac.uk.
William HollingworthSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. William.hollingworth@bristol.ac.uk.
Chris MetcalfeSchool of Social and Community Medicine, and Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. Chris.Metcalfe@bristol.ac.uk.
Sunita ProcterSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. Sunita.procter@bristol.ac.uk.
Adrian DavisAdrian Davis Associates, 49 Monmouth Road, Bristol, BS7 8LF, UK. adrian.davis@phonecoop.coop.
Rona CampbellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. Rona.campbell@bristol.ac.uk.
Fiona GillisonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. f.b.gillison@bath.ac.uk.
Sarah E RodgersFarr Institute, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK. s.e.rodgers@swansea.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation MR/KO232331/1Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health PHR/13/117/01Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity increases the risk of many chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers. It is recommended that adults should undertake at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity throughout the week but many adults do not achieve this. An opportunity for working adults to accumulate the recommended activity levels is through the daily commute.

methodsEmployees will be recruited from workplaces in south-west England and south Wales. In the intervention arm, workplace Walk-to-Work promoters will be recruited and trained. Participating employees will receive Walk-to-Work materials and support will be provided through four contacts from the promoters over 10 weeks. Workplaces in the control arm will continue with their usual practice. The intervention will be evaluated by a cluster randomized controlled trial including economic and process evaluations. The primary outcome is daily minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Secondary outcomes are: overall physical activity; sedentary time; modal shift away from private car use during the commute; and physical activity/MVPA during the commute. Accelerometers, GPS receivers and travel diaries will be used at baseline and one year follow-up. Questionnaires will be used at baseline, immediately post intervention, and one year follow-up. The process evaluation will examine the context, delivery and response to the intervention from the perspectives of employers, Walk-to-Work promoters and employees using questionnaires, descriptive statistics, fieldnotes and interviews. A cost-consequence study will include employer, employee and health service costs and outcomes. Time and consumables used in implementing the intervention will be measured. Journey time, household commuting costs and expenses will be recorded using travel diaries to estimate costs to employees. Presenteeism, absenteeism, employee wellbeing and health service use will be recorded. DISCUSSION: Compared with other forms of physical activity, walking is a popular, familiar and convenient, and the main option for increasing physical activity in sedentary populations. To our knowledge, this is the first full-scale randomised controlled trial to objectively measure (using accelerometers and GPS receivers) the effectiveness of a workplace intervention to promote walking during the commute to and from work.

trial registrationISRCTN15009100 (10 December 2014).

Indexed as

WalkingWorkplaceAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesTransportationWales

Identifiers

PMID25884986
PMCPMC4339476
OpenAlexW2059932136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.