Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884815›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Implementing a patient-initiated review system in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative evaluation.

Sue Child, Victoria A Goodwin, Mark G Perry, Christian A Gericke, Richard Byng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sue ChildPenCLAHRC, Plymouth University Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Tamar Science Park, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. susan.child@plymouth.ac.uk.
Victoria A GoodwinPenCLAHRC, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter, EX2 4SG, UK. V.Goodwin@exeter.ac.uk.
Mark G PerryDepartment of Rheumatology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8DH, UK. mark.perry3@nhs.net.
Christian A GerickeThe Wesley Research Institute, University of Queensland Schools of Medicine and Population Health and Queensland Brain Institute, PO Box 499, Brisbane, QLD 4066, Australia. CGericke@wesleyresearch.com.au.
Richard ByngPenCLAHRC, Plymouth University Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Tamar Science Park, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. richard.byng@plymouth.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health RDA/02/06/41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), a chronic relapsing condition primarily affecting joints usually entails regular hospital reviews with a specialist. These reviews can occur when the patient is well. This study forms part of a service evaluation of a system wide implementation of a patient initiated review appointment system which we have called Direct Access (DA). The aim was to explore the experiences of patients and staff of a DA system in order to understand the process of the implementation and to identify potential improvements.

methodsTwenty-three patients with RA that had completed one year of follow-up on the DA system and seven healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the implementation of the DA review system took part in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data and field notes.

resultsFour themes emerged in the data: (1) building patient confidence and empowerment, (2) right place right time, (3) safety, (4) the everyday challenges of managing change. These show that in order for implementation to be successful the patient needs to have confidence in using a new system of requesting a medical review, which, in turn, needs to be offered quickly and in a setting convenient to both patient and clinician. Embedded in the change process need to be systems for ensuring regular disease monitoring and general issues surrounding team working, communication and ownership of the change process also need to be considered from the outset.

conclusionThe clinics offer increased patient autonomy and the opportunity for greater self-management of chronic disease. This fits with new models of care where the patient is considered to be 'the expert'.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care PlanningQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementTime-to-Treatment

Identifiers

PMID25884815
PMCPMC4404042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.