Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884724›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Comparing the effects of sun exposure and vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D insufficiency, and immune and cardio-metabolic function: the Sun Exposure and Vitamin D Supplementation (SEDS) Study.

Mica Hartley, Samuel Hoare, Fiona E Lithander, Rachel E Neale, Prue H Hart, Shelley Gorman, Peter Gies, Jill Sherriff, Ashwin Swaminathan, Lawrence J Beilin and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Serum Vitamin D Level and Risk of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Case-Control Study.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mica HartleyNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia. mica.hartley@anu.edu.au.
Samuel HoareNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia. sam.hoare@dhhs.tas.gov.au.
Fiona E LithanderUniversity of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Fiona.Lithander@canberra.edu.au.
Rachel E NealeQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Rachel.Neale@qimrberghofer.edu.au.
Prue H HartTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. prue.hart@telethonkids.org.au.
Shelley GormanTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. shelley.gorman@telethonkids.org.au.
Peter GiesAustralian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. peter.gies@arpansa.gov.au.
Jill SherriffCurtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. jill.sherriff@curtin.edu.au.
Ashwin SwaminathanThe Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Ashwin.Swaminathan@act.gov.au.
Lawrence J BeilinSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. lawrie.beilin@uwa.edu.au.
Trevor A MoriSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. trevor.mori@uwa.edu.au.
Laura KingNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia. laura.king@anu.edu.au.
Lucinda J BlackTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. lucinda.black@telethonkids.org.au.
Kushani MarshallNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia. Kushani.marshall@anu.edu.au.
Fan XiangNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia. fan.xiang@anu.edu.au.
Candy WyattNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia. candy.wyatt@gmail.com.
Kerryn KingAustralian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. kerryn.king@arpansa.gov.au.
Terry SlevinCancer Council of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. terry@cancerwa.asn.au.
Nirmala PandeyaUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. n.pandeya1@uq.edu.au.
Robyn M LucasNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia. robyn.lucas@anu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults living in the sunny Australian climate are at high risk of skin cancer, but vitamin D deficiency (defined here as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration of less than 50 nmol/L) is also common. Vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for a range of diseases. However, the optimal strategies to achieve and maintain vitamin D adequacy (sun exposure, vitamin D supplementation or both), and whether sun exposure itself has benefits over and above initiating synthesis of vitamin D, remain unclear. The Sun Exposure and Vitamin D Supplementation (SEDS) Study aims to compare the effectiveness of sun exposure and vitamin D supplementation for the management of vitamin D insufficiency, and to test whether these management strategies differentially affect markers of immune and cardio-metabolic function. METHODS/

designThe SEDS Study is a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of two different daily doses of vitamin D supplementation, and placebo, in conjunction with guidance on two different patterns of sun exposure. Participants recruited from across Australia are aged 18-64 years and have a recent vitamin D test result showing a serum 25(OH)D level of 40-60 nmol/L. DISCUSSION: This paper discusses the rationale behind the study design, and considers the challenges but necessity of data collection within a non-institutionalised adult population, in order to address the study aims. We also discuss the challenges of participant recruitment and retention, ongoing engagement of referring medical practitioners and address issues of compliance and participant retention.

trial registrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000290796 Registered 14 March 2013.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAustraliaClimateDietary SupplementsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeliotherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandResearch DesignRisk FactorsSeasonsSkin Neoplasms25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID25884724
PMCPMC4391331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.