Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884684›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

histoneHMM: Differential analysis of histone modifications with broad genomic footprints.

Matthias Heinig, Maria Colomé-Tatché, Aaron Taudt, Carola Rintisch, Sebastian Schafer, Michal Pravenec, Norbert Hubner, Martin Vingron, Frank Johannes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthias HeinigDepartment of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Ihnesstrasse 63-73, Berlin, 14195, Germany. heinig@molgen.mpg.de.
Maria Colomé-TatchéQuantitative Epigenetics, European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, AV, Groningen, 9713, The Netherlands. m.colome.tatche@umcg.nl.
Aaron TaudtQuantitative Epigenetics, European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, AV, Groningen, 9713, The Netherlands. a.s.taudt@umcg.nl.
Carola RintischExperimental Genetics Group, Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13092Berlin, Germany. carola.rintisch@mdc-berlin.de.
Sebastian SchaferExperimental Genetics Group, Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13092Berlin, Germany. sebastian.schaefer@mdc-berlin.de.
Michal PravenecInstitute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czeck Republic, Videnska 1083, Prague, 14220, Czech Republic. pravenec@biomed.cas.cz.
Norbert HubnerExperimental Genetics Group, Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, 13092Berlin, Germany. nhuebner@mdc-berlin.de.
Martin VingronDepartment of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Ihnesstrasse 63-73, Berlin, 14195, Germany. vingron@molgen.mpg.de.
Frank JohannesGroningen Bioinformatics Center, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, AG, Groningen, 9747, The Netherlands. frank@johanneslab.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChIP-seq has become a routine method for interrogating the genome-wide distribution of various histone modifications. An important experimental goal is to compare the ChIP-seq profiles between an experimental sample and a reference sample, and to identify regions that show differential enrichment. However, comparative analysis of samples remains challenging for histone modifications with broad domains, such as heterochromatin-associated H3K27me3, as most ChIP-seq algorithms are designed to detect well defined peak-like features.

resultsTo address this limitation we introduce histoneHMM, a powerful bivariate Hidden Markov Model for the differential analysis of histone modifications with broad genomic footprints. histoneHMM aggregates short-reads over larger regions and takes the resulting bivariate read counts as inputs for an unsupervised classification procedure, requiring no further tuning parameters. histoneHMM outputs probabilistic classifications of genomic regions as being either modified in both samples, unmodified in both samples or differentially modified between samples. We extensively tested histoneHMM in the context of two broad repressive marks, H3K27me3 and H3K9me3, and evaluated region calls with follow up qPCR as well as RNA-seq data. Our results show that histoneHMM outperforms competing methods in detecting functionally relevant differentially modified regions.

conclusionhistoneHMM is a fast algorithm written in C++ and compiled as an R package. It runs in the popular R computing environment and thus seamlessly integrates with the extensive bioinformatic tool sets available through Bioconductor. This makeshistoneHMM an attractive choice for the differential analysis of ChIP-seq data. Software is available from http://histonehmm.molgen.mpg.de .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSoftwareAnimalsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyFemaleGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistonesHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiceRatsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionHistones

Identifiers

PMID25884684
PMCPMC4347972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.