Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884295›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Incomplete meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in the domestic dog.

Federica Federici, Eskeatnaf Mulugeta, Sam Schoenmakers, Evelyne Wassenaar, Jos W Hoogerbrugge, Godfried W van der Heijden, Wiggert A van Cappellen, Johan A Slotman, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Joop S E Laven and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conservation of chromatin conformation in carnivores.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Federica FedericiDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. f.federici@erasmusmc.nl.
Eskeatnaf MulugetaDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. eskeatnaf.mulugeta@curie.fr.
Sam SchoenmakersDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.schoenmakers@erasmusmc.nl.
Evelyne WassenaarDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.wassenaar@erasmusmc.nl.
Jos W HoogerbruggeDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. johobrug@xs4all.nl.
Godfried W van der HeijdenDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. g.vanderheijden@erasmusmc.nl.
Wiggert A van CappellenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Centre, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.vancappellen@erasmusmc.nl.
Johan A SlotmanDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Centre, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.slotman@erasmusmc.nl.
Wilfred F J van IJckenErasmus Center for Biomics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.vanijcken@erasmusmc.nl.
Joop S E LavenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.laven@erasmusmc.nl.
J Anton GrootegoedDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.a.grootegoed@erasmusmc.nl.
Willy M BaarendsDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.baarends@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus Optical Imaging CentreErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn mammalian meiotic prophase, homologous chromosome recognition is aided by formation and repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Subsequently, stable associations form through homologous chromosome synapsis. In male mouse meiosis, the largely heterologous X and Y chromosomes synapse only in their short pseudoautosomal regions (PARs), and DSBs persist along the unsynapsed non-homologous arms of these sex chromosomes. Asynapsis of these arms and the persistent DSBs then trigger transcriptional silencing through meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI), resulting in formation of the XY body. This inactive state is partially maintained in post-meiotic haploid spermatids (postmeiotic sex chromatin repression, PSCR). For the human, establishment of MSCI and PSCR have also been reported, but X-linked gene silencing appears to be more variable compared to mouse. To gain more insight into the regulation and significance of MSCI and PSCR among different eutherian species, we have performed a global analysis of XY pairing dynamics, DSB repair, MSCI and PSCR in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris), for which the complete genome sequence has recently become available, allowing a thorough comparative analyses.

resultsIn addition to PAR synapsis between X and Y, we observed extensive self-synapsis of part of the dog X chromosome, and rapid loss of known markers of DSB repair from that part of the X. Sequencing of RNA from purified spermatocytes and spermatids revealed establishment of MSCI. However, the self-synapsing region of the X displayed higher X-linked gene expression compared to the unsynapsed area in spermatocytes, and was post-meiotically reactivated in spermatids. In contrast, genes in the PAR, which are expected to escape MSCI, were expressed at very low levels in both spermatocytes and spermatids. Our comparative analysis was then used to identify two X-linked genes that may escape MSCI in spermatocytes, and 21 that are specifically re-activated in spermatids of human, mouse and dog.

conclusionsOur data indicate that MSCI is incomplete in the dog. This may be partially explained by extensive, but transient, self-synapsis of the X chromosome, in association with rapid completion of meiotic DSB repair. In addition, our comparative analysis identifies novel candidate male fertility genes.

Indexed as

MeiosisSpermatogenesisX Chromosome InactivationAnimalsAnimals, DomesticChromosomes, MammalianDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDogsHumansMaleMiceSex ChromosomesSpermatocytesTestis

Identifiers

PMID25884295
PMCPMC4399420
OpenAlexW2036425674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.