Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884216›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

EMAST is associated with a poor prognosis in microsatellite instable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Sabine Venderbosch, Shannon van Lent-van Vliet, Anton F J de Haan, Marjolijn J Ligtenberg, Monique Goossens, Cornelis J A Punt, Miriam Koopman, Iris D Nagtegaal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High expression ofGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine VenderboschDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660-1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Shannon van Lent-van VlietDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anton F J de HaanDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn J LigtenbergDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Monique GoossensDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J A PuntDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660-1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Miriam KoopmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500-3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the frequency and prognostic value of elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in relation to microsatellite instability (MSI) status and MSH3 protein expression. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe frequency of EMAST was evaluated in mCRC patients with MSI tumors and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. A literature overview was performed to compare the frequency of EMAST in our study with existing data. Immunohistochemistry for MSH3 was compared with EMAST status. Outcome was studied in terms of overall survival (OS) of mCRC patients with MSI and MSS tumors.

resultsEMAST was evaluated in 89 patients with MSI tumors (including 39 patients with Lynch syndrome) and 94 patients with MSS tumors. EMAST was observed in 45.9% (84 out of 183) of patients, with an increased frequency in MSI tumors (79.8% versus 13.8%, p < 0.001). We found no correlation between EMAST and MSH3 protein expression. There was no effect of EMAST on prognosis in patients with MSS tumors, but patients with MSI / non-EMAST tumors had a significantly better prognosis than patients with MSI / EMAST tumors (OS: HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.25-8.30).

conclusionFrequency of EMAST was increased in mCRC patients with MSI tumors, compared to MSS tumors. Our data suggest that the presence of EMAST correlates with worse OS in these patients. There was no effect of EMAST on the prognosis of patients with MSS tumors. A limitation of our study is the small number of patients in our subgroup analysis.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisPromoter Regions, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID25884216
PMCPMC4401564
OpenAlexW2079784015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.