Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884206›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2015

Implementing buprenorphine in addiction treatment: payer and provider perspectives in Ohio.

Todd Molfenter, Carol Sherbeck, Mark Zehner, Andy Quanbeck, Dennis McCarty, Jee-Seon Kim, Sandy Starr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Todd MolfenterUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA. todd.molfenter@chess.wisc.edu.
Carol SherbeckUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA. carolsherbeck@chess.wisc.edu.
Mark ZehnerUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA. mark.zehner@chess.wisc.edu.
Andy QuanbeckUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA. andrew.quanbeck@chess.wisc.edu.
Dennis McCartyOregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098, USA. mccartyd@ohsu.edu.
Jee-Seon KimUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Education, 1057 Educational Sciences, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. jeeseonkim@wisc.edu.
Sandy StarrOhio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (OhioMHAS), 30 East Broad Street, 8th Floor, Columbus, Ohio, 43215, USA. sanford.starr@mha.ohio.gov.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USOhio Department of Mental Health & Addiction Services · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Impact on opioid use of bundling medication-assisted treatment with mHealthR01DA040449 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Implementing Technology-Assisted Drug Treatment and relapse prevention in FQHCsR01DA034279 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H, MARSCH, LISA A. · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
To Test A Payer/Treatment Agency Intervention to Increase Use of BuprenorphineR01DA030431 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MOLFENTER, TODD DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
Conceptualizing the problem of implementation: a systems engineering perspective applied in substance abuse treatmentK01DA039336 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI QUANBECK, ANDREW · 2015 to 2019
$741k
Physician coaching to reduce opioid-related harmsR34DA036720 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BROWN, RANDALL T, QUANBECK, ANDREW · 2014 to 2016
$683k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039336NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030431NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034279NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040449NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA036720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuprenorphine is under-utilized in treating opioid addiction. Payers and providers both have substantial influence over the adoption and use of this medication to enhance recovery. Their views could provide insights into the barriers and facilitators in buprenorphine adoption.

methodsWe conducted individual interviews with 18 Ohio county Alcohol, Drug Addiction, and Mental Health Services (ADAMHS) Boards (payers) and 36 addiction treatment centers (providers) to examine barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use. Transcripts were reviewed, coded, and qualitatively analyzed. First, we examined reasons that county boards supported buprenorphine use. A second analysis compared county boards and addiction treatment providers on perceived barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use. The final analysis compared county boards with low and high use of buprenorphine to determine how facilitators and barriers differed between those settings.

resultsCounty boards (payers) promoted buprenorphine use to improve clinical care, reduce opioid overdose deaths, and prepare providers for participation in integrated models of health care delivery with primary care clinics and hospitals. Providers and payers shared many of the same perceptions of facilitators and barriers to buprenorphine use. Common facilitators identified were knowledge of buprenorphine benefits, funds allocated to purchase buprenorphine, and support from the criminal justice system. Common barriers were negative attitudes toward use of agonist pharmacotherapy, payment environment, and physician prescribing capacity. County boards with low buprenorphine use rates cited negative attitudes toward use of agonist medication as a primary barrier. County boards with high rates of buprenorphine use dedicated funds to purchase buprenorphine in spite of concerns about limited physician prescribing capacity.

conclusionsThis qualitative analysis found that attitudes toward use of medication and medication funding environment play important roles in an organization's decision to begin buprenorphine use and that physician availability influences an organization's ability to expand buprenorphine use over time. Additional education, reimbursement support, and policy changes are needed to support buprenorphine adoption and use, along with a greater understanding of the roles payers, providers, and regulators play in the adoption of targeted practices.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeBuprenorphineHealth Care CostsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNarcotic AntagonistsOhioOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersBuprenorphineNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID25884206
PMCPMC4395880
OpenAlexW2124466569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.