Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25884154›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

DNA methylation of the LIN28 pseudogene family.

Aaron P Davis, Abby D Benninghoff, Aaron J Thomas, Benjamin R Sessions, Kenneth L White

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pseudogenes regulate parental gene expression via ceRNA network.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron P DavisDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, 4815 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-4815, USA. adavis@uwsp.edu.
Abby D BenninghoffDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, 4815 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-4815, USA. abby.benninghoff@usu.edu.
Aaron J ThomasDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, 4815 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-4815, USA. aaron.thomas@usu.edu.
Benjamin R SessionsDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, 4815 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-4815, USA. brsessions@gmail.com.
Kenneth L WhiteDepartment of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, 4815 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-4815, USA. ken.white@usu.edu.
Utah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation directs the epigenetic silencing of selected regions of DNA, including the regulation of pseudogenes, and is widespread throughout the genome. Pseudogenes are decayed copies of duplicated genes that have spread throughout the genome by transposition. Pseudogenes are transcriptionally silenced by DNA methylation, but little is known about how pseudogenes are targeted for methylation or how methylation levels are maintained in different tissues.

resultsWe employed bisulfite next generation sequencing to examine the methylation status of the LIN28 gene and four processed pseudogenes derived from LIN28. The objective was to determine whether LIN28 pseudogenes maintain the same pattern of methylation as the parental gene or acquire a methylation pattern independent of the gene of origin. In this study, we determined that the methylation status of LIN28 pseudogenes does not resemble the pattern evident for the LIN28 gene, but rather these pseudogenes appear to acquire methylation patterns independent of the parental gene. Furthermore, we observed that methylation levels of the examined pseudogenes correlate to the location of insertion within the genome. LIN28 pseudogenes inserted into gene bodies were highly methylated in all tissues examined. In contrast, pseudogenes inserted into genomic regions that are not proximal to genes were differentially methylated in various tissue types.

conclusionsOur analysis suggests that Lin28 pseudogenes do not acquire patterns of tissue-specific methylation as for the parental gene, but rather are methylated in patterns specific to the local genomic environment into which they were inserted.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPseudogenesAnimalsCattleCpG IslandsFibroblastsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMultigene FamilyOocytesRNA-Binding ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNASkinRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25884154
PMCPMC4404226
OpenAlexW2076915380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.