Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25883575›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2015

Word problems: a review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty.

Gabriella Daroczy, Magdalena Wolska, Walt Detmar Meurers, Hans-Christoph Nuerk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Mathematics Anxiety-Complexity Effect in Word Problems.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Put you in the problem: Effects of self-pronouns on mathematical problem-solving.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  7. Understanding the complexities of mathematical cognition: A multi-level framework.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving Language Comprehension to Enhance Word-Problem Solving.Reading & writing quarterly : overcoming learning difficulties · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriella DaroczyDiagnostics and Cognitive Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; LEAD Graduate School, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.
Magdalena WolskaLEAD Graduate School, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.
Walt Detmar MeurersLEAD Graduate School, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; Department of Linguistics, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph NuerkDiagnostics and Cognitive Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; LEAD Graduate School, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; Knowledge Media Research Center Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word problems (WPs) belong to the most difficult and complex problem types that pupils encounter during their elementary-level mathematical development. In the classroom setting, they are often viewed as merely arithmetic tasks; however, recent research shows that a number of linguistic verbal components not directly related to arithmetic contribute greatly to their difficulty. In this review, we will distinguish three components of WP difficulty: (i) the linguistic complexity of the problem text itself, (ii) the numerical complexity of the arithmetic problem, and (iii) the relation between the linguistic and numerical complexity of a problem. We will discuss the impact of each of these factors on WP difficulty and motivate the need for a high degree of control in stimuli design for experiments that manipulate WP difficulty for a given age group.

Indexed as

difficultylinguistics complexitynumerical complexitytext propertiesword problems

Identifiers

PMID25883575
PMCPMC4381502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.