Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25883533›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2015

The dignified approach to care: a pilot study using the patient dignity question as an intervention to enhance dignity and person-centred care for people with palliative care needs in the acute hospital setting.

Bridget Johnston, Jan Pringle, Marion Gaffney, Melanie Narayanasamy, Margaret McGuire, Deans Buchanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "What do I need to know about you?": the Patient Dignity Question, age, and proximity to death among patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patient Dignity Question: Feasible, dignity-conserving intervention in a rural hospice.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bridget JohnstonSue Ryder Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, England UK.
Jan PringleSchool of Education, Social Work and Community Education, University of Dundee, C.2.16 Carnelley Building, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland UK.
Marion GaffneyRoyal Victoria Hospital, Roxburghe House, Jedburghe Road, Dundee, DD2 1SP, Scotland UK.
Melanie NarayanasamySue Ryder Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative and End of Life Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, England UK.
Margaret McGuireNHS Tayside Headquarters, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland UK.
Deans BuchananNinewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, DD1 9SY, Scotland UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding person-centred, dignity-conserving care for hospitalised patients is central to many healthcare policies and essential to the provision of effective palliative care. The Patient Dignity Question (PDQ) "What do I need to know about you as a person to take the best care of you that I can?" was designed from empirical research on patients' perceptions of their dignity at end of life to help healthcare professionals (HCPs) understand the patient as a person.

methodsThis mixed method pilot study was designed to inform a larger multisite study in the future. It tests the hypothesis that the PDQ intervention could be used to enhance a more person-centred climate for people with palliative care needs in the acute hospital setting, and provide evidence regarding its acceptability. Outcome measures pre and post intervention Person-centred Climate Questionnaire--patient version (PCQ-P), and the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure; PDQ feedback questionnaires were used for all participants post intervention, in addition to qualitative interviews.

results30 patients, 17 HCPs, and 4 family members participated. Results showed a positive correlation between higher PCQ-P scores and higher CARE scores, indicating that the PDQ can make improvements to a person-centred environment and levels of empathy perceived by patients. Individual results from the PCQ-P and the CARE indicated overall improvements in the majority of fields. The PDQ supported disclosure of information previously unknown to HCPs, has implications for improving person-centred care. Positive results from PDQ feedback questionnaires were received from all participants. Qualitative findings indicated patients' appreciation of staff (Attributes and attitudes), that patients wanted staff to have awareness of them (Know me as a person), take the time to talk, and work flexibly, to allow for patient individuality (Time and place).

conclusionThe PDQ has potential to improve patients' perceptions of care, and HCP attitudes. Furthermore, it was well received by participants. The PDQ could be incorporated into clinical practice for the care of palliative care patients in the acute setting to the benefit of personalized and dignified care. Further research using the PDQ across wider geographical areas, and more diverse settings, would be beneficial.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFamilyFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansInpatientsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePatient-Centered CarePilot ProjectsAcute careDignityMixed methodsPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID25883533
PMCPMC4399754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.