Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25883031›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Benefit profile of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: a multicenter propensity score analysis.

Jumpei Yoshimura, Kazuma Yamakawa, Hiroshi Ogura, Yutaka Umemura, Hiroki Takahashi, Miki Morikawa, Yoshiaki Inoue, Satoshi Fujimi, Hiroshi Tanaka, Toshimitsu Hamasaki and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prediction of Early Death in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Coagulation Disorder Treated With Antithrombin Supplementation.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Disseminated intravascular coagulation.Journal of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jumpei YoshimuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandai-Higashi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan. jumpei.y0210@gmail.com.
Kazuma YamakawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandai-Higashi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan. k.yamakawa0911@gmail.com.
Hiroshi OguraDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. ogura@hp-emerg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Yutaka UmemuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandai-Higashi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan. plum00022@gmail.com.
Hiroki TakahashiDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. thirokikmu@yahoo.co.jp.
Miki MorikawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University, Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan. tsumiki@juntendo-urayasu.jp.
Yoshiaki InoueDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University, Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan. yinoue@juntendo-urayasu.jp.
Satoshi FujimiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandai-Higashi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan. fujimis@opho.jp.
Hiroshi TanakaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University, Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan. htanaka@juntendo-urayasu.jp.
Toshimitsu HamasakiOffice of Biostatistics and Data Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan. toshi.hamasaki@ncvc.go.jp.
Takeshi ShimazuDepartment of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. shimazu@hp-emerg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPOsaka University · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe safety and efficacy of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) have been demonstrated, with promising evidence suggestive of efficacy for patients with severe sepsis involving coagulopathy in a phase IIb randomized controlled trial. However, the benefit profiles of rhTM have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to explore whether patients with greater disease severity, determined according to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, would experience treatment benefit from rhTM administration.

methodsThis was a post hoc, subgroup analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in three Japanese tertiary referral hospitals. Patients with sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) who required ventilator management were included. We stratified patients into several strata according to disease severity, determined by APACHE II and SOFA scores, using classification and regression trees for survival data. Intervention effects, expressed as hazard ratios (HR), were analyzed using Cox regression analysis adjusted for a propensity model to detect subgroup heterogeneity of the effects of rhTM on in-hospital mortality.

resultsParticipants were 162 patients with sepsis-induced DIC; 68 of these patients received rhTM and 94 did not. After adjusting for imbalances, rhTM administration was significantly associated with reduced mortality in high-risk patients (APACHE II: 24 to 29; HR: 0.281; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.093 to 0.850; P = 0.025). A similar nonsignificant tendency was observed in the very high-risk subset (APACHE II: ≥30; HR: 0.529; 95% CI: 0.202 to 1.387; P = 0.195) but was not evident in the moderate-risk subset of patients (APACHE II: <24; HR: 0.814; 95% CI: 0.351 to 1.884; P = 0.630). A similar tendency was observed in analysis of SOFA scores (moderate-risk subset (SOFA: <11), P = 0.368; high-risk subset (SOFA: ≥11), P = 0.042).

conclusionsSurvival benefit was observed with rhTM treatment in sepsis-induced DIC and high risk of death according to baseline APACHE II and SOFA scores.

Indexed as

AgedAPACHEDisseminated Intravascular CoagulationFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRecombinant ProteinsRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesSepsisThrombomodulinTreatment OutcomeRecombinant ProteinsThrombomodulin

Identifiers

PMID25883031
PMCPMC4367899
OpenAlexW1996911785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.