ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015
The ependymal region of the adult human spinal cord differs from other species and shows ependymoma-like features.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmenting AMPA receptor signaling after spinal cord injury increases ependymal-derived neural stem/progenitor cell migration and promotes functional recovery.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Positive Evolution of a Child Suffering from Caudal Regression Syndrome and Agenesia Sacra After Treatment with Growth Hormone and Rehabilitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Ependymal cells: roles in central nervous system infections and therapeutic application.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Review
- An analytic model for the flow induced in syringomyelia cavities.Journal of fluid mechanics · 2024Article
- The activation of dormant ependymal cells following spinal cord injury.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Persistence of FoxJ1Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- Review
- Stem Cell Therapies for Restorative Treatments of Central Nervous System Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023Review
- Corrigendum: Purinergic signaling systems across comparative models of spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2023Article
- The Theory ofGenes · 2022Article
- Purinergic signaling systems across comparative models of spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2022Review
- Restoration of spinal cord injury: From endogenous repairing process to cellular therapy.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- The immune microenvironment and tissue engineering strategies for spinal cord regeneration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Review
- Article
- The Structure of the Spinal Cord Ependymal Region in Adult Humans Is a Distinctive Trait among Mammals.Cells · 2021Article
- Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.Cells · 2021Review
- Turning the Curve Into Straight: Phenogenetics of the Spine Morphology and Coordinate Maintenance in the Zebrafish.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Frizzled 1 and Wnt1 as new potential therapeutic targets in the traumatically injured spinal cord.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several laboratories have described the existence of undifferentiated precursor cells that may act like stem cells in the ependyma of the rodent spinal cord. However, there are reports showing that this region is occluded and disassembled in humans after the second decade of life, although this has been largely ignored or interpreted as a post-mortem artefact. To gain insight into the patency, actual structure, and molecular properties of the adult human spinal cord ependymal region, we followed three approaches: (i) with MRI, we estimated the central canal patency in 59 control subjects, 99 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury, and 26 patients with non-traumatic spinal cord injuries. We observed that the central canal is absent from the vast majority of individuals beyond the age of 18 years, gender-independently, throughout the entire length of the spinal cord, both in healthy controls and after injury; (ii) with histology and immunohistochemistry, we describe morphological properties of the non-lesioned ependymal region, which showed the presence of perivascular pseudorosettes, a common feature of ependymoma; and (iii) with laser capture microdissection, followed by TaqMan® low density arrays, we studied the gene expression profile of the ependymal region and found that it is mainly enriched in genes compatible with a low grade or quiescent ependymoma (53 genes); this region is enriched only in 14 genes related to neurogenic niches. In summary, we demonstrate here that the central canal is mainly absent in the adult human spinal cord and is replaced by a structure morphologically and molecularly different from that described for rodents and other primates. The presented data suggest that the ependymal region is more likely to be reminiscent of a low-grade ependymoma. Therefore, a direct translation to adult human patients of an eventual therapeutic potential of this region based on animal models should be approached with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.