Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25882650›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015

The ependymal region of the adult human spinal cord differs from other species and shows ependymoma-like features.

Daniel Garcia-Ovejero, Angel Arevalo-Martin, Beatriz Paniagua-Torija, José Florensa-Vila, Isidro Ferrer, Lukas Grassner, Eduardo Molina-Holgado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Persistence of FoxJ1Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Theory ofGenes · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Garcia-Ovejero1 Laboratory of Neuroinflammation, Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos (SESCAM), Toledo, Spain dgarciao@sescam.jccm.es.
Angel Arevalo-Martin1 Laboratory of Neuroinflammation, Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos (SESCAM), Toledo, Spain.
Beatriz Paniagua-Torija1 Laboratory of Neuroinflammation, Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos (SESCAM), Toledo, Spain.
José Florensa-Vila2 Radiology Unit, Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos (SESCAM), Toledo, Spain.
Isidro Ferrer3 Institut de Neuropatologia, Servei d'Anatomia Patolo`gica, IDIBELL-Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Lukas Grassner4 Center for Spinal Cord Injuries, Trauma Center Murnau, Germany 5 Institute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, SCI-TReCS (Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eduardo Molina-Holgado1 Laboratory of Neuroinflammation, Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos (SESCAM), Toledo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several laboratories have described the existence of undifferentiated precursor cells that may act like stem cells in the ependyma of the rodent spinal cord. However, there are reports showing that this region is occluded and disassembled in humans after the second decade of life, although this has been largely ignored or interpreted as a post-mortem artefact. To gain insight into the patency, actual structure, and molecular properties of the adult human spinal cord ependymal region, we followed three approaches: (i) with MRI, we estimated the central canal patency in 59 control subjects, 99 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury, and 26 patients with non-traumatic spinal cord injuries. We observed that the central canal is absent from the vast majority of individuals beyond the age of 18 years, gender-independently, throughout the entire length of the spinal cord, both in healthy controls and after injury; (ii) with histology and immunohistochemistry, we describe morphological properties of the non-lesioned ependymal region, which showed the presence of perivascular pseudorosettes, a common feature of ependymoma; and (iii) with laser capture microdissection, followed by TaqMan® low density arrays, we studied the gene expression profile of the ependymal region and found that it is mainly enriched in genes compatible with a low grade or quiescent ependymoma (53 genes); this region is enriched only in 14 genes related to neurogenic niches. In summary, we demonstrate here that the central canal is mainly absent in the adult human spinal cord and is replaced by a structure morphologically and molecularly different from that described for rodents and other primates. The presented data suggest that the ependymal region is more likely to be reminiscent of a low-grade ependymoma. Therefore, a direct translation to adult human patients of an eventual therapeutic potential of this region based on animal models should be approached with caution.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingCase-Control StudiesEpendymaEpendymomaFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSpecies SpecificitySpinal CanalSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuriescentral canalependymomaneural stem cellsregenerationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID25882650
PMCPMC4614133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.