Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25882030›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Readability of patient discharge instructions with and without the use of electronically available disease-specific templates.

Stephanie K Mueller, Kyla Giannelli, Robert Boxer, Jeffrey L Schnipper

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Scoping Review on How to Make Hospitals health Literate Healthcare Organizations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Readability assessment of patient-provider electronic messages in a primary care setting.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie K MuellerBWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA BWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA smueller1@partners.org.
Kyla GiannelliBWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA BWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert BoxerBWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA BWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey L SchnipperBWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA BWH Hospitalist Service and Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

The Safety and Quality of Inter-hospital Transfers for Hospitalized AdultsK08HS023331 · AHRQ · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MUELLER, STEPHANIE · 2015 to 2019
$771k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLow health literacy is common, leading to patient vulnerability during hospital discharge, when patients rely on written health instructions. We aimed to examine the impact of the use of electronic, patient-friendly, templated discharge instructions on the readability of discharge instructions provided to patients at discharge. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 233 patients discharged from a large tertiary care hospital to their homes following the implementation of a web-based "discharge module," which included the optional use of diagnosis-specific templated discharge instructions. We compared the readability of discharge instructions, as measured by the Flesch Reading Ease Level test (FREL, on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater readability) and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level test (FKGL, measured in grade levels), between discharges that used templated instructions (with or without modification) versus discharges that used clinician-generated instructions (with or without available templated instructions for the specific discharge diagnosis).

resultsTemplated discharge instructions were provided to patients in 45% of discharges. Of the 55% of patients that received clinician-generated discharge instructions, the majority (78.1%) had no available templated instruction for the specific discharge diagnosis. Templated discharge instructions had higher FREL scores (71 vs. 57, P < .001) and lower FKGL scores (5.6 vs. 7.6, P < .001), compared to clinician-generated discharge instructions. DISCUSSION: The use of electronically available templated discharge instructions was associated with better readability (a higher FREL score and a lower FKGL score) than the use of clinician-generated discharge instructions. The main reason for clinicians to create discharge instructions was the lack of available templates for the patient's specific discharge diagnosis.

conclusionsUse of electronically available templated discharge instructions may be a viable option to improve the readability of written material provided to patients at discharge, although the library of available templates requires expansion.

Indexed as

ComprehensionPatient DischargeAdultContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicRetrospective Studiescare transitionshealth information technologyhealth literacyhospital medicine

Identifiers

PMID25882030
PMCPMC11737644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.