Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25881969›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2015

Targeting the sarcomere to correct muscle function.

Peter M Hwang, Brian D Sykes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cardiac Troponin ActivatorJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High sensitivity top-down proteomics captures single muscle cell heterogeneity in large proteoforms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter M HwangDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, 11350 83 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada.
Brian D SykesDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, 474 Medical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 37769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various human diseases can disrupt the balance between muscle contraction and relaxation. Sarcomeric modulators can be used to readjust this balance either indirectly by intervening in signalling pathways or directly through interaction with the muscle proteins that control contraction. Such agents represent a novel approach to treating any condition in which striated muscle function is compromised, including heart failure, cardiomyopathies, skeletal myopathies and a wide range of neuromuscular conditions. Here, we review agents that modulate the mechanical function of the sarcomere, focusing on emerging compounds that target myosin or the troponin complex.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathiesHeart FailureHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscular DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesSarcomeresSignal TransductionMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25881969
OpenAlexW2040264002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.