Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25881251›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

How UK internet websites portray breast milk expression and breast pumps: a qualitative study of content.

Rhona J McInnes, Alix Arbuckle, Pat Hoddinott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Marketing BreastInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methods of milk expression for lactating women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rhona J McInnesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. r.j.mcinnes@stir.ac.uk.
Alix ArbuckleMaster of Health Research (MRes) programme, School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. alix.arbuckle@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk.
Pat HoddinottNursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. p.m.hoddinott@stir.ac.uk.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office NMAHP1Chief Scientist Office NMAHP2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExclusive breastfeeding for six months is recommended but few parents achieve this; particularly younger and less well-educated mothers. Many parents introduce infant formula milk to manage feeding but describe a desire to express breastmilk alongside a lack of support or information. The Internet is highlighted as a key resource. This study aimed to examine UK websites on expressing breastmilk to identify key messages and how information is provided.

methodsWe used search terms in Google to identify websites with information rich content on expressing breastmilk and breast pumps. Ten sites were purposively selected at two time points in 2013 and 2014 to represent 3 categories: commercial, NHS or 3(rd) sector (voluntary or not for profit). Each site was reviewed by two researchers, data and reflective analytical notes were uploaded into NVivo and thematic data analysis undertaken.

resultsSites varied considerably in their design, use of images, videos, audio files, product placement and marketing opportunities. Three key themes emerged: depiction of expressing; reasons to express; and recommendations about expressing. Inconsistent and conflicting information was common within and between sites. Expressing was portrayed as similar to, but easier than, breastfeeding although at the same time difficult and requiring to be learned. Expressed breastmilk is promoted by mainly commercial sites as immediately available, although pumps were also presented as needing to be concealed, not heard or seen. Health benefits were the overarching reason for expressing. Although predicated on separation from the baby, commercial sites identified this as a positive choice while other sites focused on separation due to circumstance. Commercial sites emphasised restrictions related to breastfeeding, lack of sleep and bonding with the father and wider family. Non-commercial sites emphasised hand expression, with some not mentioning breast pumps. Practical information about starting expressing in relation to infant age or duration of breastfeeding was conflicting.

conclusionsInternet information about expressing breastmilk is inconsistent, incomplete and not evidence informed. The lack of research evidence on the relationship between expressing and feeding outcomes has provided opportunities for commercial companies, which have the potential to further exacerbate observed health inequalities. Access to good quality information based on robust evidence is urgently required.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingBreast Milk ExpressionConsumer Health InformationInternetAge FactorsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMarketingMother-Child RelationsQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25881251
PMCPMC4429834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.