Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25881159›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

A retrospective study of the prognostic value of MRI-derived residual tumors at the end of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in 358 patients with locally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Yuxiang He, Qin Zhou, Lin Shen, Yajie Zhao, Mingjun Lei, Rui Wei, Liangfang Shen, Shousong Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Residual Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuxiang HeDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. 2541032231@qq.com.
Qin ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. qin_zhou2014@yeah.net.
Lin ShenDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. linshen2014@yeah.net.
Yajie ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. yajie_zhao@yeah.net.
Mingjun LeiDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. mingjunlei@yeah.net.
Rui WeiDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. weiruix@163.com.
Liangfang ShenDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. lfshen2008@163.com.
Shousong CaoDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, P.R. China. shousongc@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo retrospectively analyze the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived residual tumors after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the patients with locally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

methodsA total of 358 patients with locally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received IMRT were classified as having residual tumors or no residual tumor based on MRI at the end of radiotherapy. The χ(2) test, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meir survival curves were used to investigate the relationship of clinicopathological features and residual tumors and to assess the prognostic value of residual tumors.

resultsThe 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 73% in the residual tumor group and 90% in the no residual tumor group (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.21-3.82,, P = 0.007); 3-year local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 89% in the residual tumor group and 97% in the no residual tumor group (HR 4.46, 95% CI 1.61-12.38, P = 0.002); 3-year disease free survival (DFS) was 67% in the residual tumor group and 82% in the no residual tumor group (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.40-3.48, P = 0.001). A high prescribed radiation dose (>73.92 Gy) did not increase the percentage volume of the GTVnx receiving 95% of the prescribed dose (GTVnx V95%) or improve any survival outcome.

conclusionThe presence of a residual tumor after IMRT was a significant negative independent prognostic factor for OS, LRFS and DFS. Although IMRT have improved the distribution of radiotherapy doses into the tumors, residual tumors detected by MRI after IMRT are still associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinomaChi-Square DistributionCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal CarcinomaAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25881159
PMCPMC4464998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.