Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25881111›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2015

The dilution effect and the importance of selecting the right internal control genes for RT-qPCR: a paradigmatic approach in fetal sheep.

Huaisheng Xu, Massimo Bionaz, Deborah M Sloboda, Loreen Ehrlich, Shaofu Li, John P Newnham, Joachim W Dudenhausen, Wolfgang Henrich, Andreas Plagemann, John Rg Challis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Huaisheng XuDepartments of Obstetrics and Division of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité - University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany. xuhuaisheng@gmail.com.
Massimo BionazAnimal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA. massimo.bionaz@oregonstate.edu.
Deborah M SlobodaDepartments of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. sloboda@mcmaster.ca.
Loreen EhrlichDepartments of Obstetrics and Division of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité - University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany. loreen.ehrlich@charite.de.
Shaofu LiSchool of Women's and Infants' Health, King Edward Memorial Hospital, The University of Western Australia, and Women and Infants Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. shaoufu.li@uwa.edu.au.
John P NewnhamSchool of Women's and Infants' Health, King Edward Memorial Hospital, The University of Western Australia, and Women and Infants Research Foundation of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. john.newnham@uwa.edu.au.
Joachim W DudenhausenDepartments of Obstetrics and Division of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité - University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany. joachim.dudenhausen@charite.de.
Wolfgang HenrichDepartments of Obstetrics and Division of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité - University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany. wolfgang.henrich@charite.de.
Andreas PlagemannDepartments of Obstetrics and Division of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité - University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany. andreas.plagemann@charite.de.
John Rg ChallisDepartments of Physiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. j.challis@utoronto.ca.
Thorsten BraunDepartments of Obstetrics and Division of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité - University Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany. thorsten.braun@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AUMcMaster University · CAOregon State University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe key to understanding changes in gene expression levels using reverse transcription real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) relies on the ability to rationalize the technique using internal control genes (ICGs). However, the use of ICGs has become increasingly problematic given that any genes, including housekeeping genes, thought to be stable across different tissue types, ages and treatment protocols, can be regulated at transcriptomic level. Our interest in prenatal glucocorticoid (GC) effects on fetal growth has resulted in our investigation of suitable ICGs relevant in this model. The usefulness of RNA18S, ACTB, HPRT1, RPLP0, PPIA and TUBB as ICGs was analyzed according to effects of early dexamethasone (DEX) treatment, gender, and gestational age by two approaches: (1) the classical approach where raw (i.e., not normalized) RT-qPCR data of tested ICGs were statistically analyzed and the best ICG selected based on absence of any significant effect; (2) used of published algorithms. For the latter the geNorm Visual Basic application was mainly used, but data were also analyzed by Normfinder and Bestkeeper. In order to account for confounding effects on the geNorm analysis due to co-regulation among ICGs tested, network analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. The expression of RNA18S, the most abundant transcript, and correlation of ICGs with RNA18S, total RNA, and liver-specific genes were also performed to assess potential dilution effect of raw RT-qPCR data. The effect of the two approaches used to select the best ICG(s) was compared by normalization of NR3C1 (glucocorticoid receptor) mRNA expression, as an example for a target gene.

resultsRaw RT-qPCR data of all the tested ICGs was significantly reduced across gestation. TUBB was the only ICG that was affected by DEX treatment. Using approach (1) all tested ICGs would have been rejected because they would initially appear as not reliable for normalization. However, geNorm analysis (approach 2) of the ICGs indicated that the geometrical mean of PPIA, HPRT1, RNA18S and RPLPO can be considered a reliable approach for normalization of target genes in both control and DEX treated groups. Different subset of ICGs were tested for normalization of NR3C1 expression and, despite the overall pattern of the mean was not extremely different, the statistical analysis uncovered a significant influence of the use of different normalization approaches on the expression of the target gene. We observed a decrease of total RNA through gestation, a lower decrease in raw RT-qPCR data of the two rRNA measured compared to ICGs, and a positive correlation between raw RT-qPCR data of ICGs and total RNA. Based on the same amount of total RNA to performed RT-qPCR analysis, those data indicated that other mRNA might have had a large increase in expression and, as consequence, had artificially diluted the stably expressed genes, such as ICGs. This point was demonstrated by a significant negative correlation of raw RT-qPCR data between ICGs and liver-specific genes.

conclusionThe study confirmed the necessity of assessing multiple ICGs using algorithms in order to obtain a reliable normalization of RT-qPCR data. Our data indicated that the use of the geometrical mean of PPIA, HPRT1, RNA18S and RPLPO can provide a reliable normalization for the proposed study. Furthermore, the dilution effect observed support the unreliability of the classical approach to test ICGs. Finally, the observed change in the composition of RNA species through time reveals the limitation of the use of ICGs to normalize RT-qPCR data, especially if absolute quantification is required.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenes, EssentialAnimalsDexamethasoneFemaleFetusGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGestational AgeGlucocorticoidsHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferasePeptidylprolyl IsomerasePregnancyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, GlucocorticoidReference StandardsDexamethasoneGlucocorticoidsHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferasePeptidylprolyl IsomeraseReceptors, Glucocorticoidribosomal protein P0Ribosomal ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID25881111
PMCPMC4352295
OpenAlexW2022712608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.