Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880947›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

E-cigarette use in the past and quitting behavior in the future: a population-based study.

Wael K Al-Delaimy, Mark G Myers, Eric C Leas, David R Strong, C Richard Hofstetter

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 86 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. A Naturalistic, Randomized Pilot Trial of E-Cigarettes: Uptake, Exposure, and Behavioral Effects.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Effect of electronic cigarette and tobacco smoking on the human saliva microbial community.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wael K Al-DelaimyWael K. Al-Delaimy, Eric C. Leas, and David R. Strong are with the Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego. Mark G. Myers is with the Psychology Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego. C. Richard Hofstetter is with the Graduate School of Public Health and the Department of Political Science, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Mark G Myers
Eric C Leas
David R Strong
C Richard Hofstetter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined whether smokers who used e-cigarettes are more likely to quit after 1 year than smokers who had never used e-cigarettes.

methodsWe surveyed California smokers (n = 1000) at 2 time points 1 year apart. We conducted logistic regression analyses to determine whether history of e-cigarette use at baseline predicted quitting behavior at follow-up, adjusting for demographics and smoking behavior at baseline. We limited analyses to smokers who reported consistent e-cigarette behavior at baseline and follow-up.

resultsCompared with smokers who never used e-cigarettes, smokers who ever used e-cigarettes were significantly less likely to decrease cigarette consumption (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30, 0.87), and significantly less likely to quit for 30 days or more at follow-up (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.18, 0.93). Ever-users of e-cigarettes were more likely to report a quit attempt, although this was not statistically significant (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.67, 1.97).

conclusionsSmokers who have used e-cigarettes may be at increased risk for not being able to quit smoking. These findings, which need to be confirmed by longer-term cohort studies, have important policy and regulation implications regarding the use of e-cigarettes among smokers.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationAdolescentAdultCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk

Identifiers

PMID25880947
PMCPMC4431097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.