Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880911›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2015

The Agewell trial: a pilot randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change intervention to promote healthy ageing and reduce risk of dementia in later life.

Linda Clare, Sharon M Nelis, Ian R Jones, John V Hindle, Jeanette M Thom, Julie A Nixon, Jennifer Cooney, Carys L Jones, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Christopher J Whitaker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clarifying healthy aging: building a common language for policy innovation within the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. ICECAP-O, the current state of play: a systematic review of studies reporting the psychometric properties and use of the instrument over the decade since its publication.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linda ClareResearch in Ageing and Cognitive Health, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2AS, UK. l.clare@bangor.ac.uk.
Sharon M NelisResearch in Ageing and Cognitive Health, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2AS, UK. s.nelis@bangor.ac.uk.
Ian R JonesWales Institute of Social & Economic Research, Data & Methods, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. jonesir4@cardiff.ac.uk.
John V HindleSchool of Medical Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. j.v.hindle@bangor.ac.uk.
Jeanette M ThomSchool of Medicine, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia. j.thom@unsw.edu.au.
Julie A NixonResearch in Ageing and Cognitive Health, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2AS, UK. j.a.nixon@bangor.ac.uk.
Jennifer CooneySchool of Sports, Health and Exercise Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. j.cooney@bangor.ac.uk.
Carys L JonesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, IMSCaR, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. c.l.jones@bangor.ac.uk.
Rhiannon Tudor EdwardsCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, IMSCaR, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. r.t.edwards@bangor.ac.uk.
Christopher J WhitakerNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. c.j.whitaker@bangor.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001888Medical Research Council G1001888/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLifestyle factors represent prime targets for behaviour change interventions to promote healthy ageing and reduce dementia risk. We evaluated a goal-setting intervention aimed at promoting increased cognitive and physical activity and improving mental and physical fitness, diet and health.

methodsThis was a pilot randomised controlled trial designed to guide planning for a larger-scale investigation, provide preliminary evidence regarding efficacy, and explore feasibility and acceptability. Primary outcomes were engagement in physical and cognitive activity. Participants aged over 50 living independently in the community were recruited through a community Agewell Centre. Following baseline assessment participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions: control (IC) had an interview in which information about activities and health was discussed; goal-setting (GS n = 24) had an interview in which they set behaviour change goals relating to physical, cognitive and social activity, health and nutrition; and goal-setting with mentoring (GM, n = 24) had the goal-setting interview followed by bi-monthly telephone mentoring. Participants and researchers were blinded to group assignment. Participants were reassessed after 12 months.

resultsSeventy-five participants were randomised (IC n = 27, GS n = 24, GM n = 24). At 12-month follow-up, the two goal-setting groups, taken together (GS n = 21, GM n = 22), increased their level of physical (effect size 0.37) and cognitive (effect size 0.15) activity relative to controls (IC n = 27). In secondary outcomes, the two goal-setting groups taken together achieved additional benefits compared to control (effect sizes ≥ 0.2) in memory, executive function, cholesterol level, aerobic capacity, flexibility, balance, grip strength, and agility. Adding follow-up mentoring produced further benefits compared to goal-setting alone (effect sizes ≥ 0.2) in physical activity, body composition, global cognition and memory, but not in other domains. Implementation of the recruitment procedure, assessment and intervention was found to be feasible and the approach taken was acceptable to participants, with no adverse effects.

conclusionsA brief, low-cost goal-setting intervention is feasible and acceptable, and has the potential to achieve increased activity engagement.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN30080637.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyAgedAgingCognitionDementiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID25880911
PMCPMC4337106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.