Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880803›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Health care resource utilization and direct medical costs for patients with schizophrenia initiating treatment with atypical versus typical antipsychotics in Tianjin, China.

Xiaoning He, Jing Wu, Yawen Jiang, Li Liu, Wenyu Ye, Haibo Xue, William Montgomery

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Cost of Relapse in Schizophrenia.PharmacoEconomics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoning HeSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, No 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China. n19900118@163.com.
Jing WuSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, No 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China. jingwu@tju.edu.cn.
Yawen JiangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. yawenjia@usc.edu.
Li LiuLilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., Shanghai, China. liuli_lucy@163.com.
Wenyu YeLilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., Shanghai, China. ye_wendy_wenyu@lilly.com.
Haibo XueLilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., Shanghai, China. 13816715862@139.com.
William MontgomeryEli Lilly and Company, Sydney, Australia. montgomery_bill@lilly.com.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USNankai University · CNLuye Pharma (China) · CNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is uncertain whether the extra acquisition costs of atypical antipsychotics over typical antipsychotics are offset by their other reduced resource use especially in hospital services in China. This study compared the psychiatric-related health care resource utilization and direct medical costs for patients with schizophrenia initiating atypical or typical antipsychotics in Tianjin, China.

methodsData were obtained from the Tianjin Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance database (2008-2010). Adult patients with schizophrenia with ≥1 prescription for antipsychotics after ≥90-day washout and 12-month continuous enrollment after first prescription was included. Psychiatric-related resource utilization and direct medical costs of the atypical and typical cohorts were estimated during the 12-month follow-up period. Logistic regressions, ordinary least square (OLS), and generalized linear models (GLM) were employed to estimate differences of resource utilization and costs between the two cohorts. One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted as a sensitivity analysis.

results1131 patients initiating either atypical (N = 648) or typical antipsychotics (N = 483) were identified. Compared with the typical cohort, the atypical cohort had a lower likelihood of hospitalization (45.8% vs. 56.7%, P < 0.001; adjusted OR: 0.58, P < 0.001) over the follow-up period. Medication costs for the atypical cohort were higher than the typical cohort ($438 vs. $187, P < 0.001); however, their non-medication medical costs were significantly lower ($1223 vs. $1704, P < 0.001). The total direct medical costs were similar between the atypical and typical cohorts before ($1661 vs. $1892, P = 0.100) and after matching ($1711 vs. 1868, P = 0.341), consistent with the results from OLS and GLM models for matched cohorts.

conclusionsThe atypical cohort had similar total direct medical costs compared to the typical cohort. Higher medication costs associated with atypical antipsychotics were offset by a reduction in non-medication medical costs, driven by fewer hospitalizations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntipsychotic AgentsChinaCohort StudiesDrug CostsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSchizophreniaYoung AdultAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25880803
PMCPMC4419499
OpenAlexW2063591194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.