ArticleBiology direct2015
QSAR based model for discriminating EGFR inhibitors and non-inhibitors using Random forest.
Article in Biology direct, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Molecular Modeling Techniques to Discover Putative HER2 Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Bioprospecting of Cholinergic Medicinal Plants for Putative Leads Against Butyrylcholinesterase Towards Alzheimer's Care.Biochemistry research international · 2026Article
- AI-driven discovery of synergistic drug combinations against pancreatic cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Modeling and Interpretability Study of the Structure-Activity Relationship for Multigeneration EGFR Inhibitors.ACS omega · 2025Article
- NfκBin: a machine learning based method for screening TNF-α induced NF-κB inhibitors.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence methods available for cancer research.Frontiers of medicine · 2024Review
- A glimpse into the future: Integrating artificial intelligence for precision HER2-positive breast cancer management.iMetaOmics · 2024Review
- Machine Learning, Molecular Docking, and Dynamics-Based Computational Identification of Potential Inhibitors against Lung Cancer.ACS omega · 2024Article
- 1-Sulfonyl-3-amino-1ACS omega · 2023Article
- A systematic pipeline of protein structure selection for computer-aided drug discovery: A case study on T790M/L858R mutant EGFR structures.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Molecular Toxicity Virtual Screening Applying a Quantized Computational SNN-Based Framework.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia Toxicity Prediction Based on Machine Learning.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Structural analysis of cannabinoids against EGFR-TK leads a novel target against EGFR-driven cell lines.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022Article
- Computer-aided prediction of inhibitors against STAT3 for managing COVID-19 associated cytokine storm.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Development of Machine Learning Models and the Discovery of a New Antiviral Compound against Yellow Fever Virus.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021Article
- Recent trends in artificial intelligence-driven identification and development of anti-neurodegenerative therapeutic agents.Molecular diversity · 2021Article
- Article
- A Review on Applications of Computational Methods in Drug Screening and Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- A Hybrid Model for Predicting Pattern Recognition Receptors Using Evolutionary Information.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Predicting Synergism of Cancer Drug Combinations Using NCI-ALMANAC Data.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is a well-characterized cancer drug target. In the past, several QSAR models have been developed for predicting inhibition activity of molecules against EGFR. These models are useful to a limited set of molecules for a particular class like quinazoline-derivatives. In this study, an attempt has been made to develop prediction models on a large set of molecules (~3500 molecules) that include diverse scaffolds like quinazoline, pyrimidine, quinoline and indole.
resultsWe train, test and validate our classification models on a dataset called EGFR10 that contains 508 inhibitors (having inhibition activity IC50 less than 10 nM) and 2997 non-inhibitors. Our Random forest based model achieved maximum MCC 0.49 with accuracy 83.7% on a validation set using 881 PubChem fingerprints. In this study, frequency-based feature selection technique has been used to identify best fingerprints. It was observed that PubChem fingerprints FP380 (C(~O) (~O)), FP579 (O = C-C-C-C), FP388 (C(:C) (:N) (:N)) and FP 816 (ClC1CC(Br)CCC1) are more frequent in the inhibitors in comparison to non-inhibitors. In addition, we created different datasets namely EGFR100 containing inhibitors having IC50 < 100 nM and EGFR1000 containing inhibitors having IC50 < 1000 nM. We trained, test and validate our models on datasets EGFR100 and EGFR1000 datasets and achieved and maximum MCC 0.58 and 0.71 respectively. In addition, models were developed for predicting quinazoline and pyrimidine based EGFR inhibitors.
conclusionsIn summary, models have been developed on a large set of molecules of various classes for discriminating EGFR inhibitors and non-inhibitors. These highly accurate prediction models can be used to design and discover novel EGFR inhibitors. In order to provide service to the scientific community, a web server/standalone EGFRpred also has been developed ( http://crdd.osdd.net/oscadd/egfrpred/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.