Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880746›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Adapting an effective lifestyle intervention towards individuals with low socioeconomic status of different ethnic origins: the design of the MetSLIM study.

Dorit Teuscher, Andrea J Bukman, Agnes Meershoek, Reint Jan Renes, Edith J M Feskens, Marleen A van Baak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Race and sex differences in dropout from the STRRIDE trials.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023
    Article
  3. Enhancing community weight loss groups in a low socioeconomic status area: Application of the COM-B model and Behaviour Change Wheel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  4. Self-Persuasion Increases Healthy Eating Intention Depending on Cultural Background.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorit TeuscherDepartment of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, P.O Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. d.teuscher@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Andrea J BukmanDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, P.O Box 8129, 6700, EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands. sandra.bukman@wur.nl.
Agnes MeershoekDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, CAPHRI, P.O Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. a.meershoek@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Reint Jan RenesDivision of Strategic Communication, Wageningen University, P.O Box 8130, 6700, EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands. reintjan.renes@hu.nl.
Edith J M FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, P.O Box 8129, 6700, EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands. edith.feskens@wur.nl.
Marleen A van BaakDepartment of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, P.O Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.vanbaak@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with low socioeconomic status (SES) and some ethnic minorities are often underrepresented in lifestyle programmes. Therefore, a lifestyle programme was developed especially targeting these groups. Developing this lifestyle programme and designing an intervention study to test the effectiveness of this programme was an informative process in which several obstacles were encountered and choices had to be made. Study protocols, however, rarely describe these obstacles encountered in the protocol design process, and it is not always clear why researchers made certain choices. Therefore, the aim of this article is to describe both the final MetSLIM study protocol and the considerations and choices made in designing this study protocol. METHODS/

designThe developed MetSLIM study has a quasi-experimental design, targeting 30- to 70-year-old adults with an elevated waist circumference, living in deprived neighbourhoods, of Dutch, Turkish or Moroccan descent. The intervention group participates in a 12-month lifestyle programme consisting of individual dietary advice, four group sessions and weekly sports lessons. The control group receives written information about a healthy lifestyle and one group session provided by a dietician. The study contains an elaborate effect, process and economic evaluation. Outcome measures are, among other things, change in waist circumference and the other components of the metabolic syndrome. DISCUSSION: Matching the preferences of the target group, such as their preferred setting, has implications for the entire study protocol. The process evaluation of the MetSLIM study will provide insight into the consequences of the choices made in the MetSLIM study protocol in terms of reach, acceptability and delivery of the programme, and the effect and economic evaluation will provide insight into the (cost)effectiveness of the lifestyle programme in order to reduce waist circumference among individuals with low SES of different ethnic origins.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR3721 (since November 27, 2012).

Indexed as

EthnicityResearch DesignAdultAgedBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Weights and MeasuresCost-Benefit AnalysisDietExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID25880746
PMCPMC4339423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.