Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2015
Head-to-head comparison of the safety of tocilizumab and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA) in clinical practice: results from the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety (REAL) registry.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04115423 (A Retrospective Cohort Study to Examine the Risk of Serious Infections in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tocilizumab Compared With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Using the National Health Insurance Database), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Retrospective Cohort Study to Examine the Risk of Serious Infections in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tocilizumab Compared With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Using the National Health Insurance Database
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of the Incidence and Influencing Factors of Malignant Tumors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Infectious Risks Associated with Biologic Therapies in Autoimmune, Rheumatologic and Dermatologic Diseases: A Narrative Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Immunometabolic mechanisms of osteosarcopenic obesity: chronic inflammation, trained immunity, and systemic immune dysregulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review: Unraveling the Role of Inflammation in the Etiology of Heart Failure.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Adalimumab-Induced Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonitis (PCP) Misdiagnosed As Methotrexate-Induced Pneumonitis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab in Japan.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Drug Persistence and Incidence of Active Tuberculosis of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitors Versus Tocilizumab as the First-Line Biological Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: Characteristics and Treatment Options.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Severe Infections in Patients Treated with Tocilizumab for Systemic Diseases Other Than Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study.European journal of rheumatology · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Utility and Adverse Effects of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Inflammatory Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Risk of Severe Infection among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Biological DMARDs: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Effect of Tocilizumab Treatment on Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Bacteremia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022Article
- Adverse Effects of Immunosuppression: Infections.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022Article
- Comparison of the drug retention and reasons for discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors in Japanese patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis-the ANSWER cohort study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2021Article
- Psoas abscess during treatment with intravenous tocilizumab in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: a case-based review.Rheumatology international · 2021Review
- Performance of the RABBIT infection risk score in an Argentinian rheumatoid arthritis cohort.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Understanding the Role of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the Joint and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review of IL-6 Inhibition for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2020Review
- Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Prescription Patterns Among Rheumatologists in Europe and Japan.Rheumatology and therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to directly compare the safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) and TNF inhibitors (TNFIs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical practice.
methodsThis prospective cohort study included RA patients starting TCZ [TCZ group, n=302, 224.68 patient-years (PY)] or TNFIs [TNFI group, n=304, 231.01 PY] from 2008 to 2011 in the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety registry. We assessed types and incidence rates (IRs) of serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) during the first year of treatment. Risks of the biologics for SAEs or SIs were calculated using the Cox regression hazard analysis.
resultsPatients in the TCZ group had longer disease duration (P<0.001), higher disease activity (P=0.019) and more frequently used concomitant corticosteroids (P<0.001) than those in the TNFI group. The crude IR (/100 PY) of SIs [TCZ 10.68 vs. TNFI 3.03; IR ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]), 3.53 (1.52 to 8.18)], but not SAEs [21.36 vs. 14.72; 1.45 (0.94 to 2.25)], was significantly higher in the TCZ group compared with the TNFI group. However, after adjusting for covariates using the Cox regression hazard analysis, treatment with TCZ was not associated with higher risk for SAEs [hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.19] or SIs (HR 2.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 5.37).
conclusionsThe adjusted risks for SAEs and SIs were not significantly different between TCZ and TNFIs, indicating an influence of clinical characteristics of the patients on the safety profile of the biologics in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.