Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880558›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Selection against heteroplasmy explains the evolution of uniparental inheritance of mitochondria.

Joshua R Christie, Timothy M Schaerf, Madeleine Beekman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Intimate Relations-Mitochondria and Ageing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Selfish genetic elements.PLoS genetics · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolution and inheritance of animal mitochondrial DNA: rules and exceptions.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current strategies towards therapeutic manipulation of mtDNA heteroplasmy.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2017
    Review
  19. What can we infer about the origin of sex in early eukaryotes?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua R ChristieSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Mathematical Biology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Timothy M SchaerfSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Mathematical Biology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Madeleine BeekmanSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Mathematical Biology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why are mitochondria almost always inherited from one parent during sexual reproduction? Current explanations for this evolutionary mystery include conflict avoidance between the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, clearing of deleterious mutations, and optimization of mitochondrial-nuclear coadaptation. Mathematical models, however, fail to show that uniparental inheritance can replace biparental inheritance under any existing hypothesis. Recent empirical evidence indicates that mixing two different but normal mitochondrial haplotypes within a cell (heteroplasmy) can cause cell and organism dysfunction. Using a mathematical model, we test if selection against heteroplasmy can lead to the evolution of uniparental inheritance. When we assume selection against heteroplasmy and mutations are neither advantageous nor deleterious (neutral mutations), uniparental inheritance replaces biparental inheritance for all tested parameter values. When heteroplasmy involves mutations that are advantageous or deleterious (non-neutral mutations), uniparental inheritance can still replace biparental inheritance. We show that uniparental inheritance can evolve with or without pre-existing mating types. Finally, we show that selection against heteroplasmy can explain why some organisms deviate from strict uniparental inheritance. Thus, we suggest that selection against heteroplasmy explains the evolution of uniparental inheritance.

Indexed as

Genes, MitochondrialHaplotypesModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsEvolution, MolecularHumansMitochondria

Identifiers

PMID25880558
PMCPMC4400020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.