Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880543›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Aro: a machine learning approach to identifying single molecules and estimating classification error in fluorescence microscopy images.

Allison Chia-Yi Wu, Scott A Rifkin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A GATA factor radiation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Single-molecule FISH inmicroPublication biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Decoding Optical Data with Machine Learning.Laser & photonics reviews · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allison Chia-Yi WuGraduate Program in Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA. allison.cy.wu@gmail.com.
Scott A RifkinGraduate Program in Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA. sarifkin@ucsd.edu.

Funding

SYNTHETIC SYSTEMSP50GM085764 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HASTY, JEFF M, IDEKER, TREY · 2010 to 2018
$23.3M
Dynamics and regulatory logic of the endodermal cell-fate decision in C. elegansR01GM103782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RIFKIN, SCOTT · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM085764NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103782NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM103782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent techniques for tagging and visualizing single molecules in fixed or living organisms and cell lines have been revolutionizing our understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of fundamental biological processes. However, fluorescence microscopy images are often noisy, and it can be difficult to distinguish a fluorescently labeled single molecule from background speckle.

resultsWe present a computational pipeline to distinguish the true signal of fluorescently labeled molecules from background fluorescence and noise. We test our technique using the challenging case of wide-field, epifluorescence microscope image stacks from single molecule fluorescence in situ experiments on nematode embryos where there can be substantial out-of-focus light and structured noise. The software recognizes and classifies individual mRNA spots by measuring several features of local intensity maxima and classifying them with a supervised random forest classifier. A key innovation of this software is that, by estimating the probability that each local maximum is a true spot in a statistically principled way, it makes it possible to estimate the error introduced by image classification. This can be used to assess the quality of the data and to estimate a confidence interval for the molecule count estimate, all of which are important for quantitative interpretations of the results of single-molecule experiments.

conclusionsThe software classifies spots in these images well, with >95% AUROC on realistic artificial data and outperforms other commonly used techniques on challenging real data. Its interval estimates provide a unique measure of the quality of an image and confidence in the classification.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyEmbryo, NonmammalianFluorescenceFluorescent DyesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroscopy, FluorescenceNanotechnologyRNA, MessengerStaining and LabelingFluorescent DyesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25880543
PMCPMC4450985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.