ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Aro: a machine learning approach to identifying single molecules and estimating classification error in fluorescence microscopy images.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A General Analytic Approach for Rapid Diagnostics by a Simple Algorithm for Fluorescence Single Molecule Counting.Biosensors · 2026Article
- A GATA factor radiation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Diversification of small RNA pathways underlies germline RNA interference incompetence in wild Caenorhabditis elegans strains.Genetics · 2024Article
- Single-molecule FISH inmicroPublication biology · 2022Article
- Decoding Optical Data with Machine Learning.Laser & photonics reviews · 2021Article
- Direct Kinetic Fingerprinting for High-Accuracy Single-Molecule Counting of Diverse Disease Biomarkers.Accounts of chemical research · 2021Article
- Automatic classification and segmentation of single-molecule fluorescence time traces with deep learning.Nature communications · 2020Article
- DeepFRET, a software for rapid and automated single-molecule FRET data classification using deep learning.eLife · 2020Article
- Yeast silencing factor Sir4 and a subset of nucleoporins form a complex distinct from nuclear pore complexes.The Journal of cell biology · 2017Article
- The parameter sensitivity of random forests.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Erratum to: 'Aro: a machine learning approach to identifying single molecules and estimating classification error in fluorescence microscopy images'.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Mutagenesis of GATA motifs controlling the endoderm regulator elt-2 reveals distinct dominant and secondary cis-regulatory elements.Developmental biology · 2016Article
- MED GATA factors promote robust development of the C. elegans endoderm.Developmental biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent techniques for tagging and visualizing single molecules in fixed or living organisms and cell lines have been revolutionizing our understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of fundamental biological processes. However, fluorescence microscopy images are often noisy, and it can be difficult to distinguish a fluorescently labeled single molecule from background speckle.
resultsWe present a computational pipeline to distinguish the true signal of fluorescently labeled molecules from background fluorescence and noise. We test our technique using the challenging case of wide-field, epifluorescence microscope image stacks from single molecule fluorescence in situ experiments on nematode embryos where there can be substantial out-of-focus light and structured noise. The software recognizes and classifies individual mRNA spots by measuring several features of local intensity maxima and classifying them with a supervised random forest classifier. A key innovation of this software is that, by estimating the probability that each local maximum is a true spot in a statistically principled way, it makes it possible to estimate the error introduced by image classification. This can be used to assess the quality of the data and to estimate a confidence interval for the molecule count estimate, all of which are important for quantitative interpretations of the results of single-molecule experiments.
conclusionsThe software classifies spots in these images well, with >95% AUROC on realistic artificial data and outperforms other commonly used techniques on challenging real data. Its interval estimates provide a unique measure of the quality of an image and confidence in the classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.