Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880535›Full record

Trial reportBMC veterinary research2015

Robenacoxib versus meloxicam for the control of peri-operative pain and inflammation associated with orthopaedic surgery in cats: a randomised clinical trial.

Cindy Speranza, Vincent Schmid, Jerome M Giraudel, Wolfgang Seewald, Jonathan N King

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC veterinary research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacology, safety, efficacy and clinical uses of the COX-2 inhibitor robenacoxib.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cindy SperanzaNovartis Santé Animale S.A.S, Clinical Development, F-92506, Rueil Malmaison Cedex, France. cindy.speranza@novartis.com.
Vincent SchmidNovartis Centre de Recherche Santé Animale SA, CH-1566, Saint-Aubin, Switzerland. vincent.schmid@novartis.com.
Jerome M GiraudelNovartis Animal Health Inc, Project Management, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland. jerome.giraudel@novartis.com.
Wolfgang SeewaldNovartis Animal Health Inc, Clinical Development, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland. wolfgang.seewald@novartis.com.
Jonathan N KingNovartis Animal Health Inc, Clinical Development, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland. jonathan.king@novartis.com.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in veterinary medicine. Robenacoxib is a NSAID with high selectivity for the cyclo-oxygenase-2 enzyme. In this study, the efficacy and safety of robenacoxib were evaluated in a prospective, randomised, active- and placebo-controlled masked clinical trial in 147 cats undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Cats were randomised into two treatment groups: Group 1, robenacoxib (2 mg/kg) administered via subcutaneous (s.c.) injection before surgery, followed by robenacoxib tablets (1-2.4 mg/kg) administered post-operatively for approximately 9 days (n = 101) and Group 2, meloxicam (0.3 mg/kg) administered s.c. before surgery, followed by placebo tablets administered post-operatively for approximately 9 days (n = 46). Cats were assessed using numerical rating scales (NRSs) by clinicians before surgery and at 3, 8, 22 and 28 hours after surgery and at the final visit (VF on approximately Day 10), and daily by their owners from Day 1 to the VF.

resultsThe primary end point was the global investigator score which was the sum of clinician NRSs for posture, behaviour and pain on palpation/manipulation. The efficacy of the single robenacoxib injection, assessed during 3 to 22 hours, was statistically non-inferior to meloxicam, with a relative efficacy of 1.029 (95% confidence interval, 0.847-1.231). No significant differences were detected during the follow-up treatment with robenacoxib tablets for approximately 9 days compared with placebo via clinician assessments at 28 hours and the VF, or in owner assessments on Days 1-VF. There were no significant differences in frequencies of reported adverse events, clinical observations and haematology or clinical chemistry variables between the groups.

conclusionsSingle s.c. injection of robenacoxib before surgery had non-inferior efficacy compared with meloxicam in controlling post-operative pain and inflammation in cats undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Follow-up treatment with oral robenacoxib tablets for approximately 9 days was well tolerated, but there were no differences in the efficacy scores after Day 1 compared with the group receiving meloxicam s.c. followed by placebo control.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCat DiseasesCatsDiphenylamineFemaleHydrocortisoneInflammationMaleMeloxicamOrthopedic ProceduresPerioperative PeriodPhenylacetatesPostoperative PainThiazinesThiazolesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiphenylamineHydrocortisoneMeloxicamPhenylacetatesrobenacoxibThiazinesThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID25880535
PMCPMC4379761
OpenAlexW1989639174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.