Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880440›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Stakeholder perspectives on implementing a universal Lynch syndrome screening program: a qualitative study of early barriers and facilitators.

Jennifer L Schneider, James Davis, Tia L Kauffman, Jacob A Reiss, Cheryl McGinley, Kathleen Arnold, Jamilyn Zepp, Marian Gilmore, Kristin R Muessig, Sapna Syngal and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How can Australia integrate routine genetic sequencing in oncology: a qualitative study through an implementation science lens.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  14. Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: patient recommendations for improved risk communication.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effective Identification of Lynch Syndrome in Gastroenterology Practice.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A framework to build capacity for a reflex-testing program for Lynch syndrome.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L SchneiderCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
James DavisCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Tia L KauffmanCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-4223
Jacob A ReissCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Cheryl McGinleyCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kathleen ArnoldCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jamilyn ZeppNorthwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Marian GilmoreNorthwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kristin R MuessigCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-2224
Sapna SyngalDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Louise AchesonCase Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Georgia L WiesnerVanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-7008
Susan K PetersonThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Katrina A B GoddardCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USCase Western Reserve University · USDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Funding

Integrating Genetic Testing for Lynch Syndrome in a Managed Care SettingR01CA140377 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GODDARD, KATRINA A. · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA140377NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence-based guidelines recommend that all newly diagnosed colon cancer be screened for Lynch syndrome (LS), but best practices for implementing universal tumor screening have not been extensively studied. We interviewed a range of stakeholders in an integrated health-care system to identify initial factors that might promote or hinder the successful implementation of a universal LS screening program.

methodsWe conducted interviews with health-plan leaders, managers, and staff. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis began with a grounded approach and was also guided by the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM).

resultsWe completed 14 interviews with leaders/managers and staff representing involved clinical and health-plan departments. Although stakeholders supported the concept of universal screening, they identified several internal (organizational) and external (environment) factors that promote or hinder implementation. Facilitating factors included perceived benefits of screening for patients and organization, collaboration between departments, and availability of organizational resources. Barriers were also identified, including: lack of awareness of guidelines, lack of guideline clarity, staffing and program "ownership" concerns, and cost uncertainties. Analysis also revealed nine important infrastructure-type considerations for successful implementation.

conclusionWe found that clinical, laboratory, and administrative departments supported universal tumor screening for LS. Requirements for successful implementation may include interdepartmental collaboration and communication, patient and provider/staff education, and significant infrastructure and resource support related to laboratory processing and systems for electronic ordering and tracking.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisFemaleHealth PlanningHealth SurveysHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID25880440
PMCPMC4608844
OpenAlexW2041193239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.