Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880418›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2015

Ethical problems in intensive care unit admission and discharge decisions: a qualitative study among physicians and nurses in the Netherlands.

Anke J M Oerlemans, Nelleke van Sluisveld, Eric S J van Leeuwen, Hub Wollersheim, Wim J M Dekkers, Marieke Zegers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tough Clinical Decisions: Experiences of Polish Physicians.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024
    Article
  7. Ethical issues encountered by French intensive care unit caregivers during the first COVID-19 outbreak.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  8. Ableism in the intensive care unit.Intensive care medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ethical Attitudes of Intensive Care Nurses during Clinical Practice and Affecting Factors.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anke J M OerlemansScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. anke.oerlemans@radboudumc.nl.
Nelleke van SluisveldScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. nelleke.vansluisveld@radboudumc.nl.
Eric S J van LeeuwenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. eric.vanleeuwen@radboudumc.nl.
Hub WollersheimScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. hub.wollersheim@radboudumc.nl.
Wim J M DekkersScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. wim.dekkers@radboudumc.nl.
Marieke ZegersScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. marieke.zegers@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been few empirical studies into what non-medical factors influence physicians and nurses when deciding about admission and discharge of ICU patients. Information about the attitudes of healthcare professionals about this process can be used to improve decision-making about resource allocation in intensive care. To provide insight into ethical problems that influence the ICU admission and discharge process, we aimed to identify and explore ethical dilemmas healthcare professionals are faced with.

methodsThis was an explorative, descriptive study using qualitative methods (individual and focus group interviews). We conducted 19 individual interviews and 4 focus group interviews with nurses and physicians working in the ICU or the general ward of 10 Dutch hospitals.

resultsThe ethical problems in the context of ICU admission and discharge can be divided into problems concerning full bed occupancy and problems related to treatment decisions. The gap between the high level of care the ICU can provide and the lower care level in the general ward sometimes leads to mutual misunderstandings. Our results indicate that when professionals of different wards feel there is a collective responsibility and effort to solve a problem, this helps to prevent or alleviate moral distress. ICU patients' wishes are often unknown, causing healthcare professionals to err on the side of more treatment. Additionally, the highly technological nature of intensive care appears to encourage over-treatment.

conclusionsIt is important for ICUs and general wards to communicate and cooperate well, since there is a mutual dependency for optimal patient flow between the different departments. Interventions that improve the understanding and cooperation between these wards may help mitigate ethical problems. The nature of the ICU environment makes it important for healthcare professionals to be aware of the risk of over-treatment, reflect on why they do what they do, and be mindful of a possible negative impact of over-treatment on their patients. Early discussion of a patient's wishes with regard to treatment options is important in preventing over-treatment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEthics, MedicalEthics, NursingIntensive Care UnitsQuality of Health CareCooperative BehaviorCritical CareDecision MakingFocus GroupsHealth Services MisuseHumansInterprofessional RelationsMoralsNetherlandsNursesPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID25880418
PMCPMC4344998
OpenAlexW2002553430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.