Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880414›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2015

Patient self-management in primary care patients with mild COPD - protocol of a randomised controlled trial of telephone health coaching.

Manbinder S Sidhu, Amanda Daley, Rachel Jordan, Peter A Coventry, Carl Heneghan, Sue Jowett, Sally Singh, Jennifer Marsh, Peymane Adab, Jinu Varghese and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Manbinder S SidhuResearch Fellow, Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. m.s.sidhu@bham.ac.uk.
Amanda DaleyPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. a.daley@bham.ac.uk.
Rachel JordanDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. r.jordan@bham.ac.uk.
Peter A CoventryCentre for Primary Care: Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Peter.A.Coventry@manchester.ac.uk.
Carl HeneghanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. carl.heneghan@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Sue JowettSchool of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. s.jowett@bham.ac.uk.
Sally SinghDepartment of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. sally.singh@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.
Jennifer MarshDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. J.L.Marsh@bham.ac.uk.
Peymane AdabDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. p.adab@bham.ac.uk.
Jinu VargheseDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. j.varghese@bham.ac.uk.
David NunanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. david.nunan@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Amy BlakemoreCentre for Primary Care: Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. amy.blakemore@manchester.ac.uk.
Jenny StevensPrimary Care Research Network Central England, Telford, UK. jenny.stevens@telfordccg.nhs.uk.
Lee DowsonRoyal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton Road, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK. leedowson@nhs.net.
David FitzmauricePrimary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. d.a.fitzmaurice@bham.ac.uk.
Kate JollyDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. c.b.jolly@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the UK is 1.8%, although it is estimated that this represents less than half of the total disease in the population as much remains undiagnosed. Case finding initiatives in primary care will identify people with mild disease and symptoms. The majority of self-management trials have identified patients from secondary care clinics or following a hospital admission for exacerbation of their condition. This trial will recruit a primary care population with mild symptoms of COPD and use telephone health coaching to encourage self-management. METHODS/

designIn this study, using a multi-centred randomised controlled trial (RCT) across at least 70 general practices in England, we plan to establish the effectiveness of nurse-led telephone health coaching to support self-management in primary care for people who report only mild symptoms of their COPD (MRC grade 1 and 2) compared to usual care. The intervention focuses on taking up smoking cessation services, increasing physical activity, medication management and action planning and is underpinned by behavioural change theory. In total, we aim to recruit 556 patients with COPD confirmed by spirometry with follow up at six and 12 months. The primary outcome is health related quality of life using the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Spirometry and BMI are measured at baseline. Secondary outcomes include self-reported health behaviours (smoking and physical activity), physical activity measured by accelerometery (at 12 months), psychological morbidity, self-efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Longitudinal qualitative interviews will explore how engaged participants were with the intervention and how embedded behaviour change was in every day practices. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide robust evidence about the effectiveness of a novel telephone health coaching intervention to promote behaviour change and prevent disease progression in patients with mild symptoms of dyspnoea in primary care.

trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN06710391 .

Indexed as

Motor ActivityPrimary Health CareSmoking CessationTelephoneBronchodilator AgentsCounselingDyspneaEnglandHumansPractice Patterns, Nurses'Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk Reduction BehaviorSelf CareSeverity of Illness IndexBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID25880414
PMCPMC4344738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.