Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880392›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Genomic variation in tomato, from wild ancestors to contemporary breeding accessions.

José Blanca, Javier Montero-Pau, Christopher Sauvage, Guillaume Bauchet, Eudald Illa, María José Díez, David Francis, Mathilde Causse, Esther van der Knaap, Joaquín Cañizares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multi-variant GWAS and genomic prediction dissect the genetic architecture underlying tomato fruit weight.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular breeding of tomato: Advances and challenges.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

José BlancaInstitute for the Conservation and Improvement of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV), Polytechnic University of Valencia, Camino de Vera 8E, 46022, Valencia, Spain. jblanca@upv.es.
Javier Montero-PauInstitute for the Conservation and Improvement of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV), Polytechnic University of Valencia, Camino de Vera 8E, 46022, Valencia, Spain. jamonpa@upv.es.
Christopher SauvageINRA, UR 1052 Unité de Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Domaine Saint-Maurice, 67 Allée des Chênes CS60094, 84143, Montfavet Cedex, France. christopher.sauvage@avignon.inra.fr.
Guillaume BauchetINRA, UR 1052 Unité de Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Domaine Saint-Maurice, 67 Allée des Chênes CS60094, 84143, Montfavet Cedex, France. Guillaume.Bauchet@avignon.inra.fr.
Eudald IllaDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA. illaberenguer.1@osu.edu.
María José DíezInstitute for the Conservation and Improvement of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV), Polytechnic University of Valencia, Camino de Vera 8E, 46022, Valencia, Spain. mdiezni@btc.upv.es.
David FrancisDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA. francis.77@osu.edu.
Mathilde CausseINRA, UR 1052 Unité de Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Domaine Saint-Maurice, 67 Allée des Chênes CS60094, 84143, Montfavet Cedex, France. mcausse@avignon.inra.fr.
Esther van der KnaapDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA. vanderknaap.1@osu.edu.
Joaquín CañizaresInstitute for the Conservation and Improvement of Agricultural Biodiversity (COMAV), Polytechnic University of Valencia, Camino de Vera 8E, 46022, Valencia, Spain. jcanizares@upv.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestication modifies the genomic variation of species. Quantifying this variation provides insights into the domestication process, facilitates the management of resources used by breeders and germplasm centers, and enables the design of experiments to associate traits with genes. We described and analyzed the genetic diversity of 1,008 tomato accessions including Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum (SLL), S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme (SLC), and S. pimpinellifolium (SP) that were genotyped using 7,720 SNPs. Additionally, we explored the allelic frequency of six loci affecting fruit weight and shape to infer patterns of selection.

resultsOur results revealed a pattern of variation that strongly supported a two-step domestication process, occasional hybridization in the wild, and differentiation through human selection. These interpretations were consistent with the observed allele frequencies for the six loci affecting fruit weight and shape. Fruit weight was strongly selected in SLC in the Andean region of Ecuador and Northern Peru prior to the domestication of tomato in Mesoamerica. Alleles affecting fruit shape were differentially selected among SLL genetic subgroups. Our results also clarified the biological status of SLC. True SLC was phylogenetically positioned between SP and SLL and its fruit morphology was diverse. SLC and "cherry tomato" are not synonymous terms. The morphologically-based term "cherry tomato" included some SLC, contemporary varieties, as well as many admixtures between SP and SLL. Contemporary SLL showed a moderate increase in nucleotide diversity, when compared with vintage groups.

conclusionsThis study presents a broad and detailed representation of the genomic variation in tomato. Tomato domestication seems to have followed a two step-process; a first domestication in South America and a second step in Mesoamerica. The distribution of fruit weight and shape alleles supports that domestication of SLC occurred in the Andean region. Our results also clarify the biological status of SLC as true phylogenetic group within tomato. We detect Ecuadorian and Peruvian accessions that may represent a pool of unexplored variation that could be of interest for crop improvement.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideBreedingEvolution, MolecularFruitGene FrequencyGenome, PlantGenomicsHeterozygoteSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID25880392
PMCPMC4404671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.