Trial reportBMC pediatrics2015
Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of environmental enrichment in infants with or at high risk of cerebral palsy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019: Systematic Review of Interventions for Preventing and Treating Children with Cerebral Palsy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- Motor Learning Feeding Interventions for Infants at Risk of Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review.Dysphagia · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions to improve gross motor performance in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2016Pooled it
- Effects of SAFE Early Intervention Approach in the First Months of Life in Infants at Risk: A Randomized Controlled Study.Child: care, health and development · 2025Trial
- Parent-Guided Developmental Intervention for Infants With Very Low Birth Weight: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Short-term effects of SAFE early intervention approach in infants born preterm: A randomized controlled single-blinded study.Brain and behavior · 2023Trial
- Efficacy of the small step program in a randomised controlled trial for infants below age 12 months with clinical signs of CP; a study protocol.BMC pediatrics · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Intensive Family-Centered Rehabilitation and Motor Outcomes in a Child with Global Developmental Delay: A Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Defining Goal-Directed Training for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review and Framework for Implementation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Barriers, Facilitators, and a Proposed Model of Care for Implementation of Upper Limb Distributed Practice Approaches for Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to parent-delivered interventions for children with or infants at risk of cerebral palsy. An integrative review informed by behaviour change theory.Disability and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Effects of the HEP® (Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity) Approach in preterm infants with increased developmental risk: a randomized controlled study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Homeostasis-Enrichment-Plasticity (HEPJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- International consensus on early rehabilitation and nutritional management for infants at high risk of neurological impairments.Pediatric investigation · 2024Article
- HEPChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe average age for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP) is 19 months. Recent neuroplasticity literature suggests that intensive, task-specific intervention ought to commence as early as possible and in an enriched environment, during the critical period of neural development. Active motor interventions are effective in some populations, however the effects of active motor interventions on the motor outcomes of infants with CP have not been researched thoroughly, but pilot work is promising. The aim of this study was to determine the short- term effects of "GAME"; a new and novel goal-oriented activity-based, environmental enrichment therapy programme on the motor development of infants at high risk of CP and test study procedures for a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
methodsPragmatic 2-group pilot RCT to assess motor outcomes, goal attainment, parent well-being and home environment quality, after 12-weeks of GAME intervention versus standard care. GAME included: creation of movement environments to elicit motor behaviours; parent training in motor learning and task analysis; frequent practice of motor tasks using a programme that was individualised to the child, was varied and focused on self-initiated movement. Data were analyzed using multiple regression.
resultsThirteen infants were consented, randomised, treated and completed the study. At study conclusion, the GAME group (n = 6) demonstrated an advantage in Total Motor Quotient of 8.05 points on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 (PDMS-2) compared to the standard care group (n = 7) (p < .001). No significant differences existed between groups on any other measure.
conclusionsGAME appears to offer a promising and feasible new motor intervention for CP, with favourable short-term motor outcomes. A pressing need exists for an adequately powered RCT with long-term end points, to determine if GAME may advance these children's motor trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.