Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880072›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2015

Foaming Betadine Spray as a potential agent for non-labor-intensive preoperative surgical site preparation.

Roli Kargupta, Garret J Hull, Kyle D Rood, James Galloway, Clinton F Matthews, Paul S Dale, Shramik Sengupta

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roli KarguptaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Missouri, 252 Agricultural Engineering Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. rkzfb@mail.missouri.edu.
Garret J HullDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Missouri, 252 Agricultural Engineering Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. gjhz7c@mail.missouri.edu.
Kyle D RoodDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, Columbia, MO, USA. krood7@gmail.com.
James GallowayDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, Columbia, MO, USA. jgallowa@ITS.JNJ.com.
Clinton F MatthewsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Missouri, 252 Agricultural Engineering Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. cfm145@gmail.com.
Paul S DaleDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, Columbia, MO, USA. Dale.Paul@NavicentHealth.org.
Shramik SenguptaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Missouri, 252 Agricultural Engineering Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. senguptas@missouri.edu.
University of Missouri · USUniversity of Missouri Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report published in 2009 shows that there were about 16,000 cases of surgical site infection (SSI) following ~ 850,000 operative procedures making SSI one of the most predominant infection amongst nosocomial infections. Preoperative skin preparation is a standard procedure utilized to prevent SSIs thereby improving patient outcomes and controlling associated healthcare costs. Multiple techniques/ products have been used for pre-operative skin preparation, like 2 step scrubbing and painting, 2 step scrubbing and drying, and 1 step painting with a drying time. However, currently used products require strict, time consuming and labor-intensive protocols that involve repeated mechanical scrubbing. It can be speculated that a product requiring a more facile protocol will increase compliance, thus promoting a reduction in SSIs. Hence, the antimicrobial efficacy of a spray-on foaming formulation containing Betadine (povidone-iodine aerosol foam) that can be administered with minimum effort is compared to that of an existing formulation/technique (Wet Skin Scrub).

methodsIn vitro antimicrobial activities of (a) 5% Betadine delivered in aerosolized foam, (b) Wet Skin Scrub Prep Tray and (c) liquid Betadine are tested against three clinically representative microorganisms (S. aureus, S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa,) on two surfaces (agar-gel on petri-dish and porcine skin). The log reduction/growth of the bacteria in each case is noted and ANOVA statistical analysis is used to establish the effectiveness of the antimicrobial agents, and compare their relative efficacies.

resultsWith agar gel as the substrate, no growth of bacteria is observed for all the three formulations. With porcine skin as the substrate, the spray-on foam's performance was not statistically different from that of the Wet Skin Scrub Prep technique for the microorganisms tested.

conclusionsThe povidone-iodine aerosolized foam could potentially serve as a non-labor intensive antimicrobial agent for surgical site preparation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCross InfectionDisinfectantsDisinfectionHumansPovidone-IodinePreoperative CarePseudomonas aeruginosaSkinStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisSurgical Wound InfectionSwineDisinfectantsPovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID25880072
PMCPMC4392728
OpenAlexW2099353888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.