Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25880071›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2015

First report on seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pigs in Central Ethiopia.

Endrias Zewdu Gebremedhin, Mulisa Megerssa Kebeta, Mebratu Asaye, Hagos Ashenafi, Vincenzo Di Marco, Maria Vitale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Veterinary world · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Endrias Zewdu GebremedhinDepartment of Veterinary Laboratory Technology, Ambo University, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, P. O. Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia. endrias.zewdu@gmail.com.
Mulisa Megerssa KebetaJigjiga University, College of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 307, Jijiga, Ethiopia. mulisam38@gmail.com.
Mebratu AsayeGondar University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia. assayemebratu@yahoo.com.
Hagos AshenafiDepartment of Parasitology and Pathology, Addis Ababa University, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, P.O. Box 34, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. hagos83@yahoo.com.
Vincenzo Di MarcoItalian National Reference Centre for Toxoplasmosis at Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia A. Mirri, Palermo, Italy. dimarco.vince@gmail.com.
Maria VitaleItalian National Reference Centre for Toxoplasmosis at Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia A. Mirri, Palermo, Italy. marvitus@yahoo.com.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Sicilia · ITAddis Ababa University · ETAmbo University · ETJigjiga University · ETUniversity of Gondar · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxoplasma gondii is one of the most widely prevalent cyst forming Apicomplexan parasites with significant impact on animal production particularly in sheep, goats and pigs. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to estimate the seroprevalence and to assess risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pigs. A systematic random sampling technique was used to collect 402 blood samples from pigs in Central Ethiopia. Direct Agglutination Test (DAT) was used to test sera. A questionnaire survey was made to assess potential risk factors and knowledge of farm attendants about toxoplasmosis.

resultsAn overall seroprevalence of 32.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 27.6%-36.9%] was found. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that extensively managed pigs (39.7%) are nearly twice (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:=1.91, 95% CI: 1.01, 3.63) at higher risk of acquiring toxoplasmosis than intensively managed pigs (30.5%). Pigs supplied with feed containing animal byproducts had nearly four times (OR = 3.84, 95% CI: 2.01, 7.36) higher risk of acquiring T. gondii infection. Most of the farm attendants had little knowledge of health risks due to cats, neither to human nor to animals. Absence of rodent control, high neonatal mortality and history of abortion were found among herds of the studied pig farms.

conclusionsT. gondii infections in pigs are wide spread. Extensive management systems and pig feed types containing animal byproducts are independent predictors of T. gondii seropositivity. The high seroprevalence suggests that pigs might serve as an important source of T. gondii infection for people. This is the first report of seroepidemiology of T. gondii infection in pigs in Ethiopia. Further studies are warranted for designing appropriate prevention and control strategies.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsCoombs TestEthiopiaFemaleMaleRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSwineSwine DiseasesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, Animal

Identifiers

PMID25880071
PMCPMC4363341
OpenAlexW1969260855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.