ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
The quantitative methods boot camp: teaching quantitative thinking and computing skills to graduate students in the life sciences.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eras of bioinformatics technologies from command-line interfaces to artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Insight from Biology Program Learning Outcomes: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.CBE life sciences education · 2023Article
- Bruins-in-Genomics: Evaluation of the impact of a UCLA undergraduate summer program in computational biology on participating students.PloS one · 2022Article
- Moving a Flipped Class Online To Teach Python to Biomedical Ph.D. Students during COVID-19 and Beyond.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2021Article
- Teaching quantitative ecology online: An evidence-based prescription of best practices.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Programming experience associated with neural efficiency during figural reasoning.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Ad hoc efforts for advancing data science education.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Successful Integration of Data Science in Undergraduate Biostatistics Courses Using Cognitive Load Theory.CBE life sciences education · 2019Article
- Article
- Introduction to Genomic Analysis Workshop: A catalyst for engaging life-science researchers in high throughput analysis.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Training for translation between disciplines: a philosophy for life and data sciences curricula.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Eleven quick tips for running an interdisciplinary short course for new graduate students.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Technology as a tool in teaching quantitative biology at the secondary and undergraduate levels: a review.Letters in biomathematics · 2018Article
- Null effects of boot camps and short-format training for PhD students in life sciences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- NeuroManager: a workflow analysis based simulation management engine for computational neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The past decade has seen a rapid increase in the ability of biologists to collect large amounts of data. It is therefore vital that research biologists acquire the necessary skills during their training to visualize, analyze, and interpret such data. To begin to meet this need, we have developed a "boot camp" in quantitative methods for biology graduate students at Harvard Medical School. The goal of this short, intensive course is to enable students to use computational tools to visualize and analyze data, to strengthen their computational thinking skills, and to simulate and thus extend their intuition about the behavior of complex biological systems. The boot camp teaches basic programming using biological examples from statistics, image processing, and data analysis. This integrative approach to teaching programming and quantitative reasoning motivates students' engagement by demonstrating the relevance of these skills to their work in life science laboratories. Students also have the opportunity to analyze their own data or explore a topic of interest in more detail. The class is taught with a mixture of short lectures, Socratic discussion, and in-class exercises. Students spend approximately 40% of their class time working through both short and long problems. A high instructor-to-student ratio allows students to get assistance or additional challenges when needed, thus enhancing the experience for students at all levels of mastery. Data collected from end-of-course surveys from the last five offerings of the course (between 2012 and 2014) show that students report high learning gains and feel that the course prepares them for solving quantitative and computational problems they will encounter in their research. We outline our course here which, together with the course materials freely available online under a Creative Commons License, should help to facilitate similar efforts by others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.