ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2015
Cilostazol ameliorates atrial ionic remodeling in long-term rapid atrial pacing dogs.
Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIonic remodeling has a close correlation with the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial tachypacing remodeling is associated with characteristic ionic remodeling. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of cilostazol, an oral phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor, for preventing atrial ionic remodeling in long-term rapid atrial pacing (RAP) dogs.
methodsWe use the methods of patch-clamp and molecular biology to investigate the effect of cilostazol on ion channel and channel gene expression in long-term RAP dogs. Twenty-one dogs were randomly assigned to sham, control paced, and paced+cilostazol (5 mg/kg/d, cilo) groups, with 7 dogs in each group. The sham group was instrumented with a pacemaker but without pacing. RAP at 500 beats/min was maintained for 2 weeks in the paced and cilo groups. During the pacing, cilostazol was given orally in the cilo group. Whole-cell patch-clamp technique was used to record atrial L-type Ca2+ (ICaL) and fast sodium channel (INa) ionic currents. Western blot and RT-PCR were applied to estimate the gene expression of the ICaLα) 1C (Cav1.2) and INav1.5α) Nav1.5α) subunits. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0.
resultsThe density of ICaL and INa currents (pA/pF) was significantly reduced in the paced group (ICaL: -6.55±1.42 vs. -4.46±0.59 pA/pF; INa: -48.24±10.54 vs. -30.48±5.20 pA/pF, p<0.01). The paced+cilo group could not increase the density of ICaL currents (ICaL: -4.37±1.25 pA/pF, p>0.05), while the INa currents were recovered (-44.54±12.65 pA/pF, p<0.01) compared with the paced group. The mRNA and protein expression levels of Cav1.2 and Nav1.5α were apparently down-regulated in the paced group (p<0.01), but after cilostazol treatment, both of these subunits were up-regulated significantly (p<0.01).
conclusionCilostazol may have protective effects on RAP-induced atrial ionic remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.