Observational studyPloS one2015
Impact of temporary opening using a stent retriever on clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke.
Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving the Clinical Outcome in Stroke Patients Receiving Thrombolytic or Endovascular Treatment in Korea: from the SECRET Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStent retriever has a distinct ability to restore blood flow temporarily before achieving final reperfusion. There has been a limited report regarding the clinical impact of it. We investigated if temporary opening of occluded vessels using a stent retriever before final reperfusion might improve clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients who received the endovascular reperfusion treatment.
methodsWe enrolled consecutive ischemic stroke patients who had an initial occlusive lesion in the anterior circulation and achieved final reperfusion (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction [TICI] ≥2) by endovascular treatment. Temporary opening was defined as the presence of ante grade flow (TICI≥2) during deployment of a stent retriever. Favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale score≤2 at 90 day.
resultsA total of 98 patients were included in the study and temporary opening was achieved in 49 (50%). Temporary opening was associated with favorable outcome (odds ratio, 7.825; 95% confidence interval, 1.592-38.461; p = 0.011) in the multivariate analysis. The probability of having a favorable outcome tended to decrease as time from onset to final reperfusion increased in patients without temporary opening. However, this trend was not evident in the patient with temporary opening. The beneficial effect of temporary opening on clinical outcome seemed to be present in patients with good collaterals but not in patients with poor collaterals.
conclusionsTemporary opening of occluded vessel using a stent retriever may be beneficial for improving clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.