Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25879905›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

The effect of a sit-stand workstation intervention on daily sitting, standing and physical activity: protocol for a 12 month workplace randomised control trial.

Jennifer Hall, Louise Mansfield, Tess Kay, Alison K McConnell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02172599 (The Influence of Sit-stand Workstations Upon Total Physical Activity), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02172599 nacompletednot on this map

The Influence of Sit-stand Workstations Upon Total Physical Activity: a 12 Month Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrunel UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled30ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsSit-stand workstation provision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer HallDivision of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, England, UK. Jennifer.Hall@brunel.ac.uk.
Louise MansfieldDivision of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, England, UK. Louise.Mansfield@brunel.ac.uk.
Tess KayDivision of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, England, UK. Tess.Kay@brunel.ac.uk.
Alison K McConnellDivision of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, England, UK. Alison.McConnell@brunel.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA lack of physical activity and excessive sitting can contribute to poor physical health and wellbeing. The high percentage of the UK adult population in employment, and the prolonged sitting associated with desk-based office-work, make these workplaces an appropriate setting for interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity. This pilot study aims to determine the effect of an office-based sit-stand workstation intervention, compared with usual desk use, on daily sitting, standing and physical activity, and to examine the factors that underlie sitting, standing and physical activity, within and outside, the workplace. METHODS/

designA randomised control trial (RCT) comparing the effects of a sit-stand workstation only and a multi-component sit-stand workstation intervention, with usual desk-based working practice (no sit-stand workstation) will be conducted with office workers across two organisations, over a 12 month period (N = 30). The multicomponent intervention will comprise organisational, environmental and individual elements. Objective data will be collected at baseline, and after 2-weeks, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months of the intervention. Objective measures of sitting, standing, and physical activity will be made concurrently (ActivPAL3™ and ActiGraph (GT3X+)). Activity diaries, ethnographic participant observation, and interviews with participants and key organisational personnel will be used to elicit understanding of the influence of organisational culture on sitting, standing and physical activity behaviour in the workplace. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first long-term sit-stand workstation intervention study utilising an RCT design, and incorporating a comprehensive process evaluation. The study will generate an understanding of the factors that encourage and restrict successful implementation of sit-stand workstation interventions, and will help inform future occupational wellbeing policy and practice. Other strengths include the objective measurement of physical activity during both work and non-work hours. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02172599, 22nd June 2014.

Indexed as

ExerciseResearch DesignSedentary BehaviorAdultEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleOccupational HealthPilot ProjectsTime FactorsWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID25879905
PMCPMC4336471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.