Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25879760›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Consensus building to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness: a qualitative outcome mapping study.

Carolyn Ehrlich, Elizabeth Kendall, Nicolette Frey, Michelle Denton, Steve Kisely

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn EhrlichCentre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation, Menzies Health Institute, Queensland, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia. c.ehrlich@griffith.edu.au.
Elizabeth KendallCentre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation, Menzies Health Institute, Queensland, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia. e.kendall@griffith.edu.au.
Nicolette FreyCentre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation, Menzies Health Institute, Queensland, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia. n.frey@griffith.edu.au.
Michelle DentonCentre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation, Menzies Health Institute, Queensland, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia. m.denton@griffith.edu.au.
Steve KiselySchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. s.kisely@uq.edu.au.
Griffith University · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe poor physical health of people with severe mental illness (SMI) is often attributed to lifestyle, disease-related medication side effects and disparate provision of healthcare. The complexity and inexact nature of this issue prohibits the identification of a clear and concise causal pathway, which in turn leads to uncertainty and imprecision about the most appropriate action to address the problem. One proposed solution is to integrate care across multiple organisations and sectors through collaborative processes. The objective of this study was to identify collective pathways of action that were consensually developed and which could be initiated by clinicians to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness.

methodsEighteen participants from a service catchment area in Australia were involved in a consensus-building workshop. This resulted in participants identifying and committing to a range of collaborative actions and processes to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness. Consensus building was combined with an outcome mapping process, which has previously been used to facilitate health system integration. Data from the consensus-building workshop were thematically analysed and used to create an outcome map.

resultsParticipants identified that accessible, continuous, holistic, consumer-driven, recovery-oriented care was required if improved physical health of people with SMI were to be achieved. However, this all-encompassing care was dependant on a wide-ranging philosophical shift in two areas, namely societal stigma and the dominance of pharmacological approaches to care. Participants believed that this shift was contingent on the attitude and behaviours of healthcare professionals and would require an inclusive, networked approach to care delivery and maximal utilization of existing funding.

conclusionsRarely do multiple stakeholders from different sectors within the healthcare system have the opportunity to come together and create a collective vision for improving the health of a specific population in a defined area. We used a consensus building approach to generate solutions, actions and goal statements, which were then used to create a visual map that provided a purpose and signposts for action, thereby maximising the potential for cohesive action across sectors.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth StatusPractice Guidelines as TopicHealth PersonnelHealth PromotionHumansMental DisordersPatient Care TeamPsychiatric NursingQualitative ResearchQueensland

Identifiers

PMID25879760
PMCPMC4351836
OpenAlexW2074352958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.