Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25879521›Full record

ArticleThe breast journal

Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Laura L Reimers, Parijatham S Sivasubramanian, Dawn Hershman, Mary Beth Terry, Heather Greenlee, Julie Campbell, Kevin Kalinsky, Matthew Maurer, Ramona Jayasena, Rossy Sandoval and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The breast journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plasma metabolomics profiles and breast cancer risk.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Introducing a Comprehensive Informatics Framework to Promote Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Chemoprevention in the Primary Care Setting.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura L ReimersDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Parijatham S SivasubramanianDepartment of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Dawn HershmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Heather GreenleeDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Julie CampbellDepartment of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Kevin KalinskyDepartment of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Matthew MaurerDepartment of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Ramona JayasenaHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Rossy SandovalHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Maria AlvarezHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Katherine D CrewDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024156 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2006 to 2011
$53.0M
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY/BIOSTATISTICS/ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCEST32CA009529 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I. · 1985 to 2012
$4.3M
Increasing breast cancer chemoprevention in the primary care settingR01CA177995 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CREW, KATHERINE D, KUKAFKA, RITA · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177995NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009529NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024156NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoprevention with the anti-estrogens, tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors, reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, uptake has been poor (<5%) in the prevention setting. We assessed use of anti-estrogens for breast cancer prevention, among high-risk women seen at an academic breast center, to observe how uptake rates compare in this setting. We collected data on demographics, breast cancer risk factors, and health behaviors via self-administered questionnaires and medical chart abstraction. Women eligible for chemoprevention with anti-estrogens had a 5-year predicted breast cancer risk according to the Gail model of ≥1.67%, history of lobular or ductal carcinoma in situ (LCIS/DCIS), and/or BRCA mutation. We dichotomized anti-estrogen use as ever or never. Predictors of use were evaluated using multivariable log-binomial regression. Of 412 high-risk women enrolled, 316 (77%) were eligible for chemoprevention. Among eligible women, 55% were non-Hispanic white, 29% Hispanic, 8% non-Hispanic black, and 7% Asian. Women were grouped based upon their highest category of breast cancer risk (in descending order): BRCA mutation carriers (3%), DCIS (40%), LCIS (22%), and 5-year Gail risk ≥1.67% (36%). Among those eligible for chemoprevention, 162 (51%) had ever initiated anti-estrogen therapy (71% tamoxifen, 23% raloxifene, 5% aromatase inhibitor). Anti-estrogen use was highest among women with DCIS (73%). In multivariable analysis, women with a 5-year Gail risk ≥1.67% had approximately a 20% lower likelihood of anti-estrogen use compared to women with DCIS (p = 0.01). In the primary prevention setting, excluding women diagnosed with DCIS, anti-estrogen use was 37%. Multivariable analysis showed differences in uptake by education and potentially by race/ethnicity. Among high-risk women seen at a breast center, anti-estrogen use for chemoprevention was relatively high as compared to the published literature. Clinicians can support high-risk women by effectively communicating breast cancer risk and enhancing knowledge about the risks and benefits of chemoprevention.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorAdultAnticarcinogenic AgentsAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsChemopreventionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationRaloxifene HydrochlorideRisk AssessmentSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenAnticarcinogenic AgentsAromatase InhibitorsRaloxifene HydrochlorideSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenaromatase inhibitorbreast cancerchemopreventionhigh-riskraloxifeneselective estrogen receptor modulatortamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID25879521
PMCPMC4490034
OpenAlexW2104916621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.