Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25879438›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015

Do patient-reported outcome measures cover personal factors important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? A mixed methods design using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as frame of reference.

Mona Dür, Michaela Coenen, Michaela Alexandra Stoffer, Veronika Fialka-Moser, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Ingvild Kjeken, Răzvan Gabriel Drăgoi, Malin Mattsson, Carina Boström, Josef Smolen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Mona DürMedical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. mona.duer@fh-krems.ac.at.
Michaela CoenenLudwig-Maximilians-University, Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Research Unit for Bio Psychosocial Health, Marchioninistraße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany. michaela.coenen@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Michaela Alexandra StofferMedical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. michaela.stoffer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Veronika Fialka-MoserMedical University of Vienna, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. mona.duer@fh-krems.ac.at.
Alexandra Kautzky-WillerMedical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Diabetology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. alexandra.kautzky-willer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Ingvild KjekenDiakonhjemmet Hospital, National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Postbox 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway. ingvild.kjeken@diakonsyk.no.
Răzvan Gabriel Drăgoi"Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, Piata Eftimie Murgu 2, Timişoara, 300041, Timis, Romania. rdragoi@gmail.com.
Malin MattssonLuleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, SE-971 87, Luleå, Sweden. malin.mattsson@nll.se.
Carina BoströmKarolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 83 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. carina.bostrom@ki.se.
Josef SmolenMedical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. josef.smolen@meduniwien.ac.at.
Tanja Alexandra StammMedical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. tanja.stamm@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATDiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOFH Campus Wien · ATKarolinska Institutet · SESunderby sjukhus · SEVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · ROZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal factors (PFs) are internal factors that determine functioning and the individuals' experience of disability. Their coverage by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has not been examined in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) so far. The aims of this study were to identify PFs important in the life stories of people with RA and to determine their coverage by PROMs used in RA.

methodsThe qualitative data of people with RA was explored to identify PFs. Additionally a systematic literature search was conducted to find PROMs used in RA. PROMs items were linked to the components, domains and categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to determine the coverage of important PFs by PROMs.

resultsTwelve PFs were found to be important in the life stories of people with RA. The PFs coping and reflecting about one's life in an optimistic way were covered most frequently, each by 14 of the 42 explored PROMs, while job satisfaction was not covered at all. The London Coping with Rheumatoid Arthritis Questionnaire, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Revised Ways of Coping Inventory covered most PFs. Nineteen PROMs did not cover any of the PFs.

conclusionSeveral PFs were identified as important in the life stories of people with RA, but only 55% of the PROMS covered some of these PFs. When evaluating PFs important to people with RA, health professionals should be alert on which PROMs can be used to assess which PFs.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentAdultArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID25879438
PMCPMC4379722
OpenAlexW2165023572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.