Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25879427›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2015

An international cross-sectional survey on the Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICO-PC): recruitment and data collection of places delivering primary care across Canada.

Sabrina T Wong, Leena W Chau, William Hogg, Gary F Teare, Baukje Miedema, Mylaine Breton, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Alan Katz, Fred Burge, Antoine Boivin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computer use in primary care practices in Canada.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sabrina T WongSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada. Sabrina.wong@nursing.ubc.ca.
Leena W ChauSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada. leena.chau@nursing.ubc.ca.
William HoggThe Canadian Primary Health Care Research and Innovation Network (CPHCRIN), Ottawa, Canada. whogg@uottawa.ca.
Gary F TeareInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. gteare@hqc.sk.ca.
Baukje MiedemaFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. Baukje.miedema@horizonnb.ca.
Mylaine BretonUniversité de Sherbrooke, Charles LeMoyne Research Center Hospital, Sherbrooke, Canada. Mylaine.breton@usherbrooke.ca.
Kris Aubrey-BasslerFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada. kaubrey@mun.ca.
Alan KatzDepartments of Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. akatz@cpe.umanitoba.ca.
Fred BurgeFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. Fred.burge@dal.ca.
Antoine BoivinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada. Antoine.boivin@umontreal.ca.
Tim CookeHealth Quality Council of Alberta, Calgary, Canada. Tim.cooke@hqca.ca.
Danièle FrancoeurInstitut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ), Québec, Canada. daniele.francoeur@inspq.qc.ca.
Walter P WodchisInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. walter.wodchis@utoronto.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerformance reporting in primary health care in Canada is challenging because of the dearth of concise and synthesized information. The paucity of information occurs, in part, because the majority of primary health care in Canada is delivered through a multitude of privately owned small businesses with no mechanism or incentives to provide information about their performance. The purpose of this paper is to report the methods used to recruit family physicians and their patients across 10 provinces to provide self-reported information about primary care and how this information could be used in recruitment and data collection for future large scale pan-Canadian and other cross-country studies.

methodsCanada participated in an international large scale study-the QUALICO-PC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care) study. A set of four surveys, designed to collect in-depth information regarding primary care activities was collected from: practices, providers, and patients (experiences and values). Invitations (telephone, electronic or mailed) were sent to family physicians. Eligible participants were sent a package of surveys. Provincial teams kept records on the number of: invitation emails/letters sent, physicians who registered, practices that were sent surveys, and practices returning completed surveys. Response and cooperation rates were calculated.

resultsInvitations to participate were sent to approximately 23,000 family physicians across Canada. A total of 792 physicians and 8,332 patients from 772 primary care practices completed the surveys, including 1,160 participants completing a Patient Values survey and 7,172 participants completing a Patient Experience survey. Overall, the response rate was very low ranging from 2% (British Columbia) to 21% (Nova Scotia). However, the participation rate was high, ranging from 72% (Ontario) to 100% (New Brunswick/Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland & Labrador).

conclusionsThe difficulties obtaining acceptable response rates by family physicians for survey participation is a universal challenge. This response rate for the QUALICO-PC arm in Canada was similar to rates found in other countries such as Australia and New Zealand. Even though most family physicians operate as self-employed small businesses, they could be supported to routinely submit data through a collective effort and provincial mandate. The groundwork in setting up pan-Canadian collaboration in primary care has been established through this study.

Indexed as

Family PracticeAdultAgedFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25879427
PMCPMC4339081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.