ArticlePerspectives in clinical research
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: "P" values, statistical significance and confidence intervals.
Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Nonlinear Relationship Between Total Bilirubin and Coronary Heart Disease: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Estimating the Burden of Common Mental Disorders Attributable to Lifestyle Factors: Protocol for the Global Burden of Disease Lifestyle and Mental Disorder (GLAD) Project.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Factors Affecting Visual Acuity After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Study in Japan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Statistical Fragility of Platelet-Rich Plasma as Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Simulated Fragility Analysis.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2022Article
- The prevalence and clinical features associated of hypothyroidism among Thai systemic sclerosis patients.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Potential effects of lowering the threshold of statistical significance in the field of chronic rhinosinusitis - A meta-research on published randomized controlled trials over last decade.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
- Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The perils of multiple testing.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
- Non-inferiority trials.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
- Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
- Sample size calculation in clinical research.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the second part of a series on pitfalls in statistical analysis, we look at various ways in which a statistically significant study result can be expressed. We debunk some of the myths regarding the 'P' value, explain the importance of 'confidence intervals' and clarify the importance of including both values in a paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.